10 Reasons
-
Top 10 reasons why there are no sex scandals in Singapore...
10. Can't even be naked in own home, how to have sex?
9. Ah Lians don't exactly turn our leaders on.
8. Our leaders are cloned; no need for sex.
7. Hotels in Geylang no longer allowed to rent out rooms by the hour.
6. Sex not one of the 5 C's.
5. Oral sex still illegal in Singapore.
4. SPGs only go for foreigners.
3. Kiasee - don't want to get AIDS
2. Amended Women's Charter can bankrupt adulterous men.
1. And the number one reason why there are no sex scandals...Still confused over condoms and condos. -
10. Can't even be naked in own home, how to have sex?
we can't?
-
Originally posted by jesslyn1992:
we can't?
You try loh.
-
Originally posted by jesslyn1992:
we can't?
We can. Just make sure windows closed. :D Thats if you really want to be naked at home la..
-
what's wrong with being naked at our OWN house?
-
Originally posted by jesslyn1992:
what's wrong with being naked at our OWN house?
Nothing wrong. Just being open-minded haha. But of course must make sure u are ALONE at home when you do that, especially if you are a girl...
-
More like if windows are opened and if neighbours spot you, they'll file a complaint with the police etc.
-
actually in sg we can do everything n nothing...
everything that is allow under the law, that is...
but if we offend other, even it is lawful, we can be under the law......
like neighbour sees us walking about in our birthday suit.....
silly rite?... -
Originally posted by cassie:
More like if windows are opened and if neighbours spot you, they’ll file a complaint with the police etc.
huh why? what does that have to do with them? it's their fault that they peep right right?
-
but its your fault for 'parading' lol...
-
Originally posted by jesslyn1992:
huh why? what does that have to do with them? it's their fault that they peep right right?
actually, we got many many strict law here..... -
hahahaha
-
hm!
-
Originally posted by 4sg:
5. Oral sex still illegal in Singapore.
u sure?
-
Originally posted by 4sg:
7. Hotels in Geylang no longer allowed to rent out rooms by the hour.
5. Oral sex still illegal in Singapore.U sure? I thought Hotel 81 still rents out by the hour? lol. Don't get the wrong idea I've heard about the famed 2-hour rents for a long time haha.
and I thought oral sex is illegal for gays?? (no offence)
-
Originally posted by eimerz:
U sure? I thought Hotel 81 still rents out by the hour? lol. Don't get the wrong idea I've heard about the famed 2-hour rents for a long time haha.
and I thought oral sex is illegal for gays?? (no offence)
its illegal for all. If i'm not wrong, its considered "weird" or something along that line under the law, hence its punishable even if the girl agrees
-
lol
-
Originally posted by jesslyn1992:
huh why? what does that have to do with them? it's their fault that they peep right right?
Normally when they peep they wun even make a single noise about the incident
-
Originally posted by jesslyn1992:
we can't?
It depends.... you can't be naked at an opened window where the public could be viewing you through, or any place where there is direct view to your nakedness in public view. It is considered a public act and you can be charge under indecent exposure in public place, even though you are still in your own home.
-
Originally posted by eimerz:
U sure? I thought Hotel 81 still rents out by the hour? lol. Don't get the wrong idea I've heard about the famed 2-hour rents for a long time haha.
There was a period of time when almost all hotels were disallowed from renting by the hour. This rule was actually pass to clean up the streets....but later it was revoked when the hotel owners in geylang complains about the drop in profits (Over 80%). Also since there are no legal hotels that were allowed to do this, illegal back alleys "love hotels" were set up due to the suddenly increase in demand for hourly rated rooms. They are normally ran by the triads and cause concern for safety to the "patrons". The rule was relaxed for most geylang hotels thereafter. Recently this rule has been applied to hotels in Joo Chiat for the same purpose. Read the news my friends...
-
Originally posted by HollowGrowl:
its illegal for all. If i'm not wrong, its considered "weird" or something along that line under the law, hence its punishable even if the girl agrees
Some explanation of the law here for those who dun understand this part.
Section 377 of the Penal Code stipulates "Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animals, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to a fine.
"Explanation: Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary for the offence in this section".
Note: Culpable homicide not amounting to murder, attempted murder and infanticide carry a similar penalty. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt carries a far lesser penalty. And for comparing apple to apple, the penalty is a lot heavier than "sexual exploitation of child and young person" under the children and young persons act sec 7 where you will only be charged for a fine of $5000 or jailed up to 2 years or both.
The Court of Appeal had ruled in 1997 that "... when couples engaged in consensual sexual intercourse willingly indulged in fellatio and cunnilingus as a stimulant to their respective sexual urges, neither act could be considered to be against the order of nature and punishable under Section 377 of the Penal Code.
Note: In every other instance the act of fellatio between a man and a woman would be carnal intercourse against the order of nature and punishable under Section 377.
In other words, oral sex is not an offence if it forms part of foreplay leading to sexual intercourse. But oral sex on its own is an offence if it does not lead to sexual intercourse.Note : Interestingly enough, the Court of Appeal referred to a series of English and Indian cases dating back to 1817 in arriving at the decision that binds us all today. In those cases, the victims were young boys and a buffalo. The accused were charged and punished for putting their penises into the boys' mouths and the buffalo's nose.
Everytime I explain this law, a question would come to my mind....."Can durex be sued as an accomplice or advocated to a crime by selling stawberry flavour condoms?"
-
what if....
oral sex forms part of the foreplay, but you finished up in pleasure before starting to engage in sexual intercourse
-
Originally posted by eagle:
what if....
oral sex forms part of the foreplay, but you finished up in pleasure before starting to engage in sexual intercourse
then you better have more training for pre-m eject before you get caught.
-
Originally posted by Callan:
then you better have more training for pre-m eject before you get caught.
So it becomes legal if you call it pre-m
-
This joke is so old already.
I think there has already been amendments to that archaic oral sex law.