*getting dragged out of the courtroom*
NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hahahaha
You guys are funny
Objection!!
I present to you the testimony by Prosecutor Pitot on 22nd May 08, 12.26pm, out client does play mahjong, but not 2 player mahjong. We all know that mahjong is played by 3 or 4 people, therefore HOW CAN ANYONE PLAY 2 PEOPLE MAHJONG!
I present to you another evidence, being Gacky's Employment with ABC Advertising company, clearly the prosecution is unable to justify that he had excessive mahjong, if so he is working at that very moment of the time of crime! Therefore the witness presented a very big contridiction in his statement!
Objection overruled
The term '2 people mahjong' has been defined as liaison between 2 persons. Mahjong is used as an excuse for a cover up of this liaison.
Having a job does not necessarily clear a person of an obsession or compulsive behaviour.
For example is the recent case of a Japanese worker who downloaded porn into his computer during working hours. That is an compulsive disorder during work hours.
But compulsive behaviour is not limited by working hours. Playing 'mahjong' after work can be compulsive, playing 'mahjong' during weekends can be compulsive.
As long as it leads to a breakdown in communication between defendant and his peers, absence from his usual weekend schedule, disregard of his duties and responsibilities as a moderator in sgForums, so on and so forth, it can be clearly seen that its a compulsive and disruptive behaviour.
Originally posted by laurence82:Objection overruled
The term '2 people mahjong' has been defined as liaison between 2 persons. Mahjong is used as an excuse for a cover up of this liaison.
Having a job does not necessarily clear a person of an obsession or compulsive behaviour.
For example is the recent case of a Japanese worker who downloaded porn into his computer during working hours. That is an compulsive disorder during work hours.
But compulsive behaviour is not limited by working hours. Playing 'mahjong' after work can be compulsive, playing 'mahjong' during weekends can be compulsive.
As long as it leads to a breakdown in communication between defendant and his peers, absence from his usual weekend schedule, disregard of his duties and responsibilities as a moderator in sgForums, so on and so forth, it can be clearly seen that its a compulsive and disruptive behaviour.
Awww.. miss me say la.. must play hard.. beat around the bush.. Laurie so cute..
Silence in the court
*bangs hammer*
i rather bang..................
Bailiff, take the defendant away
The Court will decide on the sentencing this afternoon at 5pm
Originally posted by laurence82:Bailiff, take the defendant away
The Court will decide on the sentencing this afternoon at 5pm
Not bad.. come and escort me from my office when i knock off.
*pulls out gimp mask ...
*readies truncheon ....
Your honor, i'm afraid i've yet to cross examine the witness, clearly the witness is not telling the truth...
i like reading comic book.
Originally posted by fairlady_xoxo:
Your honor, i'm afraid i've yet to cross examine the witness, clearly the witness is not telling the truth...
Err..what witness
*looks up and down the empty witnesses list*
i need to refresh my memory. Acting blur is a crime right?
No
But ignorance of the law cannot be used as a mitigating point in defence
Originally posted by fudgester:
Prosecutor Seotiblizzard
Any objections?
No no no. No objections.
Originally posted by Pitot:i think seoti can double up as bailiff. hahahahahaha
Originally posted by laurence82:
Err..what witness
*looks up and down the empty witnesses list*
!!!
What!! This cannot be....
I demand that the defendant speak up about this!
Originally posted by Gackt247:I want to see my lawyer. This is ridiculous. Gacky is an honest man.
Gacky is a guy meh? Not gay ar?
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
Gacky is a guy meh? Not gay ar?
gay not guy meh?
Defence Counsel
Please restrain your client, and if your client wishes to defend himself, he should have made the proper arrangements prior to the trial
We cannot afford anymore outburst from your client, nor tolerate his own personal handling of his defence
And if you wish to summon your defendant for cross examination, please have the proper paper work done prior. You cannot call up your defendant or witnesses at will
This shall be my last warning
Er...yee...yes your honour...
*Wtf there's not a single witness! Mr Gacky is seriously trying to cover up for someone...but why??*
All so natural and sporting sia..