i noticed one thing in here.

• seotiblizzard

  7 May 08, 14:05

  Carry on 20. Start from Zero!

• Gosu.

  7 May 08, 16:54

  Originally posted by BadzMaro:

  i know how to make my butt wont feel cold when sit on cold toilet seat. U spank urself hardout.. then u sit down. he he

  
  lol, at least I learnt something new today

   

  *Wraps protecting pad around twist's waist to protect kidney from damage*

• newcomer

  7 May 08, 17:07

  pls dun ban my twist twist! ban me instead bah!!!

• laurence82

  7 May 08, 17:12

  wah

  guardian angel and gallant warrior

• newcomer

  7 May 08, 21:39

  U LIKE?

• laurence82

  7 May 08, 23:28

  no rikes

  coz twistie is mine

   

• laurence82

  7 May 08, 23:28

  no rikes

  coz twistie is mine

   

• fudgester

  7 May 08, 23:30

  What ish going on?

• laurence82

  7 May 08, 23:33

  spanking

  thats what going

• fudgester

  7 May 08, 23:39

  

  

   

  The 2nd Amendment of the Law of Noiseology, Paragraph 2, Line 5(b), clearly states that there is to be no spanking of offenders in this forum in the absence of the Chief Legal Affairs Officer.

  I therefore move to declare a miscarriage of justice! The defendant is to be set free!

• stellazio

  7 May 08, 23:51

  so u wana be the chief spanker? oops i meant chief legal affairs officer..

• laurence82

  7 May 08, 23:53

  Wrong

  Line 5(c) states that, the Chief Disciplinary Officer (CDO) has the right to mete out the punishment and that the Chief Legal Affairs Officer's presence is not required

  Line 5(d) reiterates the rule in the Constitution of Noiseology, that CDO is the highest ranking officer in all disciplinary cases, and that the presence of Chief Legal Affairs Officer's presence is required in a situation with all of the listed criteria

  a) the absence of the Chief Disciplinary Officer

  b) in advising the Council of Noiseology or any of its officers when a case is heard

   

   

  Also, in Law of Noiseology, Officers Duties Act, Section 3, Line 4(i) states that, if the Chief Legal Affairs Officer is absent in the course of his duty, he is to submit a written report to the Council of Noiseology to explain his absence

• fudgester

  7 May 08, 23:57

  

   

  

  Uhhhh...... please don't spank me? Please.......

• stellazio

  7 May 08, 23:57

  you prefer to do the spanking instead?

• ^tamago^

  8 May 08, 00:06

  :lol: :lol: :lol:
• seotiblizzard

  8 May 08, 11:51

  

  Alright! Let the sppaaannkingg begins!!!

• laurence82

  8 May 08, 11:53

  Originally posted by seotiblizzard:

  

  Alright! Let the sppaaannkingg begins!!!

  You are awarded Grand Spanking Officer of the Realm

  go ahead and spank twistie

• fairlady_xoxo

  8 May 08, 12:06

  OMG...Why is there a mini trial here?!

• Mospeada

  8 May 08, 12:06

  

• laurence82

  8 May 08, 12:07

  *bangs hammer*

   

  Order in the court!~!~!

• seotiblizzard

  8 May 08, 12:17

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  You are awarded Grand Spanking Officer of the Realm

  go ahead and spank twistie

  Errr.

  Im sorry your honour, i am unable to receive the title u gave me.

  Im just a small fry.

  Not worthy of this title.

  Pls take it back.

  Thank you.

• fudgester

  8 May 08, 12:19

  

  In the Law of Noiseology (5th Amendment), Internal Discipline Act, Section 8, Line 2(d) clearly states that the punishment of spanking of a fellow Noiseology member cannot be meted out by an evil banana.

  As such, Your Honour, the defence has found irrefutable evidence that the judgement of laurence82, alias 'ah lau' is illegal and hence all spankings made by this individual is to be declared null and void!

   

  

  Uhh..... upon my own checks of the Law of Noiseology, the prosecution concurs with the defence, your honour.

• laurence82

  8 May 08, 12:31

  Originally posted by fudgester:

  

  In the Law of Noiseology (5th Amendment), Internal Discipline Act, Section 8, Line 2(d) clearly states that the punishment of spanking of a fellow Noiseology member cannot be meted out by an evil banana.

  As such, Your Honour, the defence has found irrefutable evidence that the judgement of laurence82, alias 'ah lau' is illegal and hence all spankings made by this individual is to be declared null and void!

   

  

  Uhh..... upon my own checks of the Law of Noiseology, the prosecution concurs with the defence, your honour.

  
  The judge reserve the right to make qualifications on 2(d). This law was created 356 years ago when the world is riled with superstitions and the folks were fascinated by mystical artifacts, including the famous story of the Evil Banana, the Lord Supreme of Evil, Overlord of the Hell Minions and Great Spanking Chief

   

  The time has changed and its beyond the means of this court to dwell on things of the supernatural or spiritual realm. We cannot intelligently discuss, decide and act upon the existence or absence of things beyond our world.

   

  Therefore, the court finds the defence's use of this law null and void.

• fudgester

  8 May 08, 13:09

  Originally posted by laurence82:

  
  The judge reserve the right to make qualifications on 2(d). This law was created 356 years ago when the world is riled with superstitions and the folks were fascinated by mystical artifacts, including the famous story of the Evil Banana, the Lord Supreme of Evil, Overlord of the Hell Minions and Great Spanking Chief

   

  The time has changed and its beyond the means of this court to dwell on things of the supernatural or spiritual realm. We cannot intelligently discuss, decide and act upon the existence or absence of things beyond our world.

   

  Therefore, the court finds the defence's use of this law null and void.

  

  

  You mean the Law of Noiseology was first drafted in..... AD 1652?!?!

• laurence82

  8 May 08, 15:04

  Clause 5d of Internal Discipline Act was amended in 1652 AD