I did not know Edison Chen is this kind of person
-
why edison like his cock to be sucked by so many people
-
not only edison lah.... most guys like to be sucked
-
News said that cecilia and nicholas have moved out of their house and edison is coming back this couple of days to face the issue.
Guys, no more pics for Kiera not releasing pics.
-
Originally posted by qlqq9:
I am not a prude, what I meant was you condoned what those edison and females artistes are doing by taking photos of their lovemaking. So as for you if you do the same you have to guarantee that the photos will not leak to be exposed on the internet. If once it is exposed on internet, me together with others will get to see it.
i don't think it is in anyone's position to say whether its right or wrong. definitely its not wrong, because its their own private lives, and their sex lives. i think its more about whether its wise to do so or not.
if they want to take photos. its within their rights to do so. of course if things go badly, then its also their own fault.
but that doesn't make it morally wrong imo.
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
i don't think it is in anyone's position to say whether its right or wrong. definitely its not wrong, because its their own private lives, and their sex lives. i think its more about whether its wise to do so or not.
if they want to take photos. its within their rights to do so. of course if things go badly, then its also their own fault.
but that doesn't make it morally wrong imo.
didnt know bible teach u dat tis is morally right.
-
Originally posted by 798:
didnt know bible teach u dat tis is morally right.He does not know what is right and what is wrong. He not christian leh, you talked to him about bible. According to the bible, it is definitely a sin lah.
-
heard tat Cecilia even kneed down to beg Nicholas not to file a divorce..haa
if i were Nic, i cfm will file a divorce le..
wearing a 'green cap' is super no face le
-
who knows kira korkor will release videos later.... on Valentine day!
V Special: Maggie Qno right or wrong regarding filming or phototaking sex pics.... he is just unlucky
-
Originally posted by Lorry`:
who knows kira korkor will release videos later.... on Valentine day!
V Special: Maggie Qno right or wrong regarding filming or phototaking sex pics.... he is just unlucky
agreed. who doesnt have sex lives? ordinary pple might take dis kinds of pics too. some pple just haf dis kind of fetish. is just dat they are celebraties & they are suey nia. lol!
-
Originally posted by 798:
didnt know bible teach u dat tis is morally right.are you talking about taking pictures or having premarital sex?
if you're talking about premarital sex, i'd agree with you.
if you're talking about taking pictures, no, the bible didn't say that it's wrong, go read it up.
because if you're talking about taking pictures. then i'll have to ask, if it is wrong for a legally married couple to take sensual and erotic photos of each other?
it's logically, ethically, and morally not wrong, isn't it?
-
Originally posted by qlqq9:
He does not know what is right and what is wrong. He not christian leh, you talked to him about bible. According to the bible, it is definitely a sin lah.
lol, please show me the bible quote then?
-
Originally posted by qlqq9:
He does not know what is right and what is wrong. He not christian leh, you talked to him about bible. According to the bible, it is definitely a sin lah.
dumbdumb is a christian la, noob -
wow.
vincy yeung is a perfect pear shape.
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
lol, please show me the bible quote then
Hey, I don't have the bible on hand and you can approach other christians for it or just go to your priest or pastor to ask for it if you are sincerely seeking the truth.
-
Originally posted by qlqq9:
Hey, I don't have the bible on hand and you can approach other christians for it or just go to your priest or pastor to ask for it if you are sincerely seeking the truth.
lol. its ok. i'll wait for you to have a bible on hand. since you quoted the bible. i'm sure you at least remember whether its from the OT or NT? or from which book? which prophet? which psalmist? -
Originally posted by Hello Kitty:
wow.
vincy yeung is a perfect pear shape.
You so interested huh? -
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
lol. its ok. i'll wait for you to have a bible on hand. since you quoted the bible. i'm sure you at least remember whether its from the OT or NT? or from which book? which prophet? which psalmist?Then that would be a long wait or impossible I have bible at all. I have given away all bibles. This is just fundamental that christians should know about premarital sex.
-
Originally posted by qlqq9:
Then that would be a long wait or impossible I have bible at all. I have given away all bibles. This is just fundamental that christians should know about premarital sex.
ok... so i take it that you're not a christian, yet you seem confident that the bible have a stand against taking sensual photographs. to be able to "quote" it so effeciently too.
lol
oh. i wasn't talking about premarital sex. we were NEVER ONCE talking about premarital sex. or at least, i wasn't.
like you said, the stand for a christian regarding premarital sex is a clear cut one. so it should occur to you that i would never bother to discuss about that with you.
that's why i talked about the photography.
in fact, you yourself condoned the act of premarital sex, but it appears that they crossed the line for you, when they took photographs of each other.
Originally posted by qlqq9:
If they want to have sex, go ahead but if they take the photos of the lovemaking then they have to take the risk it will be very possible to be exposed one day, which it did. Both edison and those female artistes are consenting to the phototaking so no pain, I don't pity them for they ask for it.
so now you're singing a different tune? telling me about what the bible said, and your zealous pov?
hypocrite?
why do you think i was curious to why you would be ok for them to have sex and affairs, but it offends you that they took videos and pictures of themselves as part of their sex lives?
that's why again, i felt that taking pictures of themselves in itself is not morally or ethically wrong. if it was a legally married couple doing it. it would seem ok isn't it?
so please, next time, think for 5 minutes before you post stuff like "incur the wraths of others", because i certainly am not afraid of incuring the wrath of babbling fools who quote verses out of nowhere.
He does not know what is right and what is wrong. He not christian leh, you talked to him about bible. According to the bible, it is definitely a sin lah.
can you hear the soft murmurs of "where? where the bible say taking erotic photograghs with mutual consent of your beloved is a sin? where?" in the background? brushing aside the lack of evidence with a "sorry ah.. i dumped all my bibles already, so you go ask someone else" and happily patting your backside, just don't cut it for me.and by the way, you haven't answered my question regarding if it is a "sin" if it was a legally married couple who took photos and videos of each other in lovemaking.
"where? where the bible say taking erotic photograghs with mutual consent of your beloved is a sin? where.....?"
*wind blowing*
btw. the difference between being pure and being a prude is this:
being pure: making sure you don't fall in sexual sins. and if others fall, you caringly guide them back on the right track, never condemning them and covering them in love against the shame they endured, so that they will grow from the experience. so that in turn, they can be a shelter for others who are going through the same issues.
being prudish: making sure others don't fall in sexual sins. and if they do, critisize and condemn them like crazy. making sure they pay for it with the rest of their lives and never be able to live their lives ever again, and forever reminding them of their wrongdoing with a
everytime you see them.and the way i see it. you, my dear, are a prude. and a graceless one at that.
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
ok... so i take it that you're not a christian, yet you seem confident that the bible have a stand against taking sensual photographs. to be able to "quote" it so effeciently too.
lol
oh. i wasn't talking about premarital sex. we were NEVER ONCE talking about premarital sex. or at least, i wasn't.
like you said, the stand for a christian regarding premarital sex is a clear cut one. so it should occur to you that i would never bother to discuss about that with you.
that's why i talked about the photography.
in fact, you yourself condoned the act of premarital sex, but it appears that they crossed the line for you, when they took photographs of each other.
so now you're singing a different tune? telling me about what the bible said, and your zealous pov?
hypocrite?
why do you think i was curious to why you would be ok for them to have sex and affairs, but it offends you that they took videos and pictures of themselves as part of their sex lives?
that's why again, i felt that taking pictures of themselves in itself is not morally or ethically wrong. if it was a legally married couple doing it. it would seem ok isn't it?
so please, next time, think for 5 minutes before you post stuff like "incur the wraths of others", because i certainly am not afraid of incuring the wrath of babbling fools who quote verses out of nowhere.
can you hear the soft murmurs of "where? where the bible say taking erotic photograghs with mutual consent of your beloved is a sin? where?" in the background? brushing aside the lack of evidence with a "sorry ah.. i dumped all my bibles already, so you go ask someone else" and happily patting your backside, just don't cut it for me.and by the way, you haven't answered my question regarding if it is a "sin" if it was a legally married couple who took photos and videos of each other in lovemaking.
"where? where the bible say taking erotic photograghs with mutual consent of your beloved is a sin? where.....?"
*wind blowing*
Go approach your pastor for it lah, talk so much here. Just because I don't agree with you you turned table around to talk nonsense, it is christian like you who drive many unbelievers away. Do unto others what you want others to do to you. By your words you drive people away. I must have touched the raw nerve of yours so you are so pissed off and retaliated, love your enemy!
-
Originally posted by xlinngx:
agreed. who doesnt have sex lives? ordinary pple might take dis kinds of pics too. some pple just haf dis kind of fetish. is just dat they are celebraties & they are suey nia. lol!
yeah man. It's just a kind of fetish
no big deal
they are just unlucky, especially the girls
-
Originally posted by qlqq9:
Go approach your pastor for it lah, talk so much here. Just because I don't agree with you you turned table around to talk nonsense, it is christian like you who drive many unbelievers away. Do unto others what you want others to do to you. By your words you drive people away. I must have touched the raw nerve of yours so you are so pissed off and retaliated, love your enemy!
lol, so there's no conclusive evidence from you on these 2 issues then?
- is it morally and ethically right for a legally married couple to take pictures of themselves in the act of lovemaking, as a way of enhancing their sex lives.
- and where in the bible did it say that erotic photography was a sin?
ok, now this is funny. touched a raw nerve? how can the nonsense you sprew around touch any "raw nerves"
"oh, you reminded me of the horrifying moment in my life when i was brutally raped and abused by an idiot who misquoted the bible and had a myopical viewpoint about how others should handle their sex lives"
or maybe it was
"you remind me of so many other idiots who mentally abused me with their broken moral compass and accompanying mental retardation..."
let me tell you what would be possibly touching a raw nerve. is that i suspect that you're so angry about edison taking photographs of his lovers, that you're more angry about him doing that, rather than him engaging in premarital sex,
is because you, probably once made the mistake of doing having sex and your lover took pictures as a memento, and now your pictures are circulating in the world wide web and every guy, from the pimply school nerd to the hardcore rock star wannabe is jerking off to your pictures every night.
now i'm most probably wrong, but i'm just saying, that this, is called "touching a raw nerve". not your pathetic attempt to reason out why i think you are an idiot.
lol. don't be mistaken. just because i think you're an idiot, doesn't make you my enemy. in fact, i just see this as differential pov, and your reasonings just happen to make me conclude that you're an idiot with a broken moral compass and that you're focusing on the wrong issues in this edison episode.
that doesn't mean i don't "love" you, "Moi Nemico"... *cough, finally got a verse right, cough*
anyway, it's not people like me who chase away others from church. but actually it's judgemental people like you, who're more conceren with pointing out the shame of other people and their wrong doings instead of focusing on the good things they do.
people like you judge, according to your standards, by clamping others down with your own interpretation of morality, and misquoting the bible to back you up, hoping that others don't read enough of the bible to know you're misquoting it. that's how cults and terrorist groups start up, by the way.
since you're talking about bible verses, let me tell you one, you should be familiar with, judge not, lest you be judged.
you'll never know one day you might fall to temptation, and all these condemning stares and fiery speeches about how others deserve it, come crashing back down on you, how can you stand then? and when that happens. it will be "people like me" who will stand for you, and helping you move on and shooting down "people like you" for their judgemental and condemning attitudes.
and don't give me that crap about "how you'll never make that mistake la.. etc" everyone makes mistakes, everyone sins, and anyone can make the mistake that edison made. including you.
-
the whole thing is getting more and more dramtic Latest News! Kira received 7 million HK dollars, disappears forever. Beijing, Feb 12, 2008 The curtain has dropped: According to friends in HK, all the photos we have seen thus far were screen captures from videos. Gill’s photos were the first 10 minutes of the video, why? Because it was a used as a bargaining chip for extortion. Secondly, the audio of the video involves the reputation of many other big-name celebrities. Gaoqing (who?) has over 1000 photos alone, and they were partially released last year. The first time Edison’s photo got released was the result of a hacker. This hacker has the most complete data. In order to protect himself from hackers and trojans, he transferred part of his data to his Apple computer. Apple does not run Windows, and most trojan are designed towards windows. The photos that were stolen during his computer repair is only a small part, and that is to the person we come to know as Kira. Photos of Vincy Yeung released on the 9th was unexpected from EEG Music. As we know, Edison’s photo all came in a set, and every women has a complete collection including the sexual parts. Usually they are released in few numbers first, then released in completion. So Vincy has a complete collection too. Kira’s upload on the 9th, 4:45 is the last upload from Kira. He had an agreement with EEG in the amount of 700 hk dollars. Why did Gill’s manager said Gill would appear on the 11th? Because they have came to an agreement with Kira. After the money is received he needs 24 hours to confirm payment, also time for him to flee. As a matter of fact, the photos he has have already been uploaded to various free servers in the United States and Europe. If the discussion does not fall into place or if anything were to happen to him, he has set automatic emails that would email the links to his trustworthy friends, so they can spread the files. The reason Gill appears in front of the media on the 11th, and the fact that she had a big smile on her face, was because she knew the ordeal has came to a rest. What’s Kira’s gain for showing us the photos? What does he get by destroying the life of these celebrities? He is not a warrior of morals, he’s just a regular Hong Kong citizen. Money is his ultimate choice. So everyone, please stop calling for him, he has disappears forever. From tomorrow, there’s a lot more entertainers going to entertain us, and the danger is over. It is disappointed for us, but we all know the reason behind Kira’s action. Gossip The photos actually were stolen a long time ago. At first Kira talked to Edison, asking for 5 million HK dollars, but was not agreed upon. Edison was afraid he won’t be able to get back all the photos. He looked for Yeung Shou Cheng (EEG’s president) to help him on the matter. Eventually, Kira released some information to the media, the magazines last year briefly mentioned this matter. However because of EEG’s influential power, magazines were afraid to show the photos nor pay Kira. Through the help of magazine’s editor, one of the three members from Kira’s group was found. He knew whether he surrender the photos or not, he was doomed. He did not say anything while being question, and was eventually killed. The other two then fled to Southeast Asia, and again try to distort EEG and Edison. Befor the matter gains public attention Edison already knew, because both parties could not agree on a price, this time Kira was asking more than 10 millions. Edison took a private car to Shenzhen, then to Macau, took a private plane from his dad’s friend to the United States, and look for Vincy Yeung to help his cause. Yeung Shou Cheng thought he could handle the matter, but eventually it was still not solved. Kira has decided to raise the price, and released the photos the night when Edison fled HK. Since that day Kira has been raising his price every day. It is believed Kira is in Thailand and Indonesia, and Kira is a group of two, and the data has been uploaded to the United States. Do not think you have seen the best of all, why hasn’t C10’s and Maggie Q’s photo being released? Because Kira hasn’t gotten the right price, or because of safety reason, there isn’t a safe way for him to get paid. Right now, both parties are fighting. The involvement of HK police has propelled this tension to its maximum. If Kira is sure he couldn’t get his money, there’s gonna be a monster upload, but not all. The reason is because there’s heavy involvement from other celebrities, including HK, China and Taiwan. If Kira wants to live longer than Edison, he would have to have something to protect himself from. It is obvious what is going to happen to Edison, he’s going to die unnaturally. Vincy’s 3 photos was a declaration of power to EEG, showing Kira has even better materials. This action forced EEG to come to the table, leaving the police behind. Bobo’s photos that were uploaded today were no longer of importance, since she was only a sacrifice in this whole matter. However, Vincy, C10 and Maggie Q, definitely will not be released today. Because this is Kira’s ultimate chip. And the most controversial material in Kira’s collection? I dare not say, because I don’t want to die before Edison does.
-
i'm not sure it's a right thing to do leh.
i remember a quote from a show. that these people are like dogs, you feed them once, they'll come back for more..
and the photos are still with kira.. what will happen when they spent all that money? my bet is that they'll be back extorting more..
-
eh .. just saw the pictures .. the girl is really hairy !
-
like the typical shows in HK ...the triads may be hunting down kira...probably he'll be dead in no time..who knows ?Down there,everything can be done by the triads