i miss the 'traditional' horror movies... nowadays, gore = horror??!! i watched 'The Hostel' once n it still disturbed me... hmm....
Originally posted by sacredspirits:i miss the 'traditional' horror movies... nowadays, gore = horror??!! i watched 'The Hostel' once n it still disturbed me... hmm....
hahaha... maybe i still 'old fashion'... the old tactics of making one 'jump' still somehow appeals to me in a certain way.... i m thinking of watching 'The Woman in Black'... hv u seen it?
I think FD 5 explored more on the "Kill to live longer" aspect of the FD series. But, at least 5 was better than 4's crappy 3D-esque CG.
And horror-wise, I watched an old movie televised on Ch 5, called Half Light which was kinda decent in creeping me out.
It is interesting to note that FD5 is somewhat the prequel that ties back to the very first FD1.
At the end scene of FD5, is where the guy is killed by the landing gear of Flight 180, from the same plane that crashed in FD1.
I am thinking if there was an FD6 in this franchise, which timeline would they then have to emerge from, or they would have to spawn a new one.
Originally posted by dragg:after 5 movies the plot is still the same. nothing’s changed except the leads and the gory deaths.
yet all 5 grossed more than a hundred million dollars each time.
morbid curiousity?
cannot like tat say...
becoz SAW also the same thing... and yes, I refer to the movie, not the auntie saw...
actually I take SAW as pure gore... FD was like watching a show where ppl die differently in differernt situation...
To me, both SAW and FD not considered horror...
I would have to vote "The Hostel", the very first, and original one to be the most disturbing movie of the century.
It was so disturbing, it kept me awake the whole night. I didn't dare to watch that movie again. There was gore, but it wasn't the gore that was disturbing.