Why Human CREATED Religions?
-
Originally posted by Hahaha:):
Bro. U read chariots of the god? Bravo. Hahaha
Which one is the hand puppet? You or the other conspiracy buff Asromanista2001?
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Which one is the hand puppet? You or the other conspiracy buff Asromanista2001?
solly hor...............i not so boh liao as to create more clones hor.............
there are other people out there that are not bain-washed mindless fools that blindly follow mainstream news like the gospel hor.................
or for that matter..........blindly follow ridiculous fairytales in man-made religions........
-
Originally posted by Hahaha:):
Bro. U read chariots of the god? Bravo. Hahaha
what's that guy's name again ? i read a few of his books.............that fella out to make money only lah...........
but there are some amazing facts in those books that you simply can't rule out..........
-
U have read too. Hmm...Veri possible. But there r more books u can go read. There is so much info in Internet and books out there. Some info got same experience or theory or concept by different authors. Very very surpise.and really eyes opener. Have to be open minded to understand it. And and most of it got link and become veri big picture.
-
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:
solly hor...............i not so boh liao as to create more clones hor.............
there are other people out there that are not bain-washed mindless fools that blindly follow mainstream news like the gospel hor.................
or for that matter..........blindly follow ridiculous fairytales in man-made religions........
"The body is designed to operate out of rest, not stress." - Pastor you like to mock
We are living in a very stressful society. 'Greed' has given us money but no time to enjoy it.
We definitely need some heartlighted moments to de-stress.. We need to be entertained. That's where you come in. You and your hand puppet......and it's practically free of charge!
-
then time for you to pay up lor.............
-
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:
solly hor...............i not so boh liao as to create more clones hor.............
there are other people out there that are not bain-washed mindless fools that blindly follow mainstream news like the gospel hor.................
or for that matter..........blindly follow ridiculous fairytales in man-made religions........
U no religion? U anti all religion? -
Originally posted by -StarDust-:
U no religion? U anti all religion?if you mean a religion with fairytales like a Creator and Heaven/Hell.............then they're man-made and if you think about it that in today's modern society, people still believe in them becoz they want to not becoz they're true !
just like those modern scientists..........they're still Christians even though they know better..........becoz most humans feel they need to believe in a religion or something !
that's why the Buddha told his disciples........''in truth, there are no buddhas and no teachings...........''
even birth and death and rebirth are all just an illusion...............no one was ever born and no one ever died..........just as scientists today are saying the universe is just a hologram..........an illusion.........
scientists also found that there's no physical reality becoz the smallest particles are made up of energy which is not physical..............and energy cannot be created or destroyed.............
even Einstein that bastard said that time is just a very stubborn illusion................
-
I do love this forum with both camps desperately trying to convince each side to see their point when in reality the universe will die of heat death before that happens.
Before the carnage begins, can the people here please refrain from raising advanced physics concepts like the big bang, universe-branes and multiverses if you don't have a clear understanding of them. As a budding physicist, I am fully aware that these topics are actually way too complex and subtle for the layman to appreciate and I myself am still a long way from even beginning to study them. Afterall, as men of science, we must build on the assumption that we know nothing and assemble the components of experience and reasoning until we have a clearer picture. If one starts with a preconceived worldview, one tends to alter their experience through tinted glasses and corrupt their reason to to fit what he/she feels must be correct.
It is hard to prove or disprove the existence of a Creator. It follows that most religions claim that the Creator is omnipotent - thus one can always make the argument that the omnipotent Creator is able to hide its presence through whatever magical methods. However, this is not the realm of science. Remember, science starts on tiny grounds and then expand to unify grander theories. Therefore, while science cannot disprove the existance of a Creator outright, it might limit where and how the creator operates. What do I mean by that? For those familiar with differential equations, to generate a function we require an initial point and the gradient field. This is analogous to the universe where events evolve according to the initial conditions and the laws of physics. Since as far as we know, the laws of physics has always been consistent, this leaves the Creator room to set the initial conditions and the laws in the first place. No fiddling after that! (Not 100% true, I left out the possible degree of freedom offered to a creator in the form of the Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle.)
One can see the problem here. The concept of the Creator being responsible for only the beginning and the laws is vastly different from the Creators that were described in the ancient texts. The most logical explanation is that the texts, written by man of that era, suffered from vocabulary that is simply insuffiencient to describe the concept. Yet some religions claim their texts are the verbatim word of the Creator and not something written by man even though the anecdotes are suspiciously Human friendly. This begs the question: is the Creator 'dumbing down' his words so that the people can understand? Occum's Razor suggests that the more likely explanation is that such texts, like the others, are really just stories told from man's point of view.
In conclusion, it seems like all ancient religious texts described the Creator as an entity they would like to have in the context of their period.
-
Just a simple question. If God created humans, who created God ? If God can exist by himself, why can't we? It just got to show there is a possibility that existence without creation.
-
Originally posted by Pinknutri:
Just a simple question. If God created humans, who created God ? If God can exist by himself, why can't we? It just got to show there is a possibility that existence without creation.
God is not created by anything.God is eternal, have always existed before the universe. God is before all creation.
-
aiyah..............back to the chicken and egg again lah................
if God is before Creation then he will not have any physical shape............and yet all the bullcrap about humans looking like him............
considering God's most human behaviour in his dealings with humans................would the Supreme Being make living beings that would look like him ????
no farking way................unless God only has ONE testicle...........or he has THREE balls...............
-
googoomuck i have read some post you had long ago, wish to contact you for some info, you might be able to help some innocent people please email me at [email protected] to hear from you soon
-
Originally posted by passerbyforrights:
googoomuck i have read some post you had long ago, wish to contact you for some info, you might be able to help some innocent people please email me at [email protected] to hear from you soon
googoomuck's motive is very obvious. He always likes to bash non Christians especially Buddhists. I wonder how he can help innocent people. May be bash them further. Whatever he said are based on his ignorance about Buddhism and without evidence. ha ha ha.......................
-
Originally posted by passerbyforrights:
googoomuck i have read some post you had long ago, wish to contact you for some info, you might be able to help some innocent people please email me at [email protected] to hear from you soon
googoomuck can only help 2 people................
googoofuck and googoosuck
-
Originally posted by Pinknutri:
googoomuck's motive is very obvious. He always likes to bash non Christians especially Buddhists. I wonder how he can help innocent people. May be bash them further. Whatever he said are based on his ignorance about Buddhism and without evidence. ha ha ha.......................
Sources are already provided for anyone who's interested to seek the truth.
Unless the Dalai Lama and the Buddhists who acknowledged the errors are liars, nothing you do or said is going to make any difference.
Your persistent denial about the errors brings shame to yourself or perhaps even your gender.
-
Originally posted by -StarDust-:
If u have a religion or belief, dont u want ppl to respect u?Originally posted by laurence82:respect me? so in your opinion, i am superior because i got a religion or belief?
OHHHHOOOO
MIDDLE FINGER TO THE FACE!
-
I pity those innocent people who will be getting all the wrong and distorted information.
-
who provide misinfo leh ?
-
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:
who provide misinfo leh ?
You will know if you read passserbyforright's post above.
-
Originally posted by Pinknutri:
googoomuck's motive is very obvious. He always likes to bash non Christians especially Buddhists. I wonder how he can help innocent people. May be bash them further. Whatever he said are based on his ignorance about Buddhism and without evidence. ha ha ha.......................
why u bother about this fellow leh? how can u take his comments seriously here when he is running amock with his verbal diarrhea.
when a mad man shout in public, do u take him seriously or pity him because of his condition?
same thing here, when you see his motor mouth running foul here, do u take his comments seriously and get angry over nothing? simply put, he is redundant, like a dead man walking.
-
Originally posted by Pinknutri:
You will know if you read passserbyforright's post above.
it's so obvious this passerbyforright is googoomuck in disguise lah.............or his kaki, googoosuck...........
-
or agogoboy, part time dancer in phuket
-
or maybe kaki no. 2.............googoofuck.............
-
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:
or maybe kaki no. 2.............googoofuck.............
