Misled Evanglists. Let's pray for their sins
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
I never fuck children. Never!
but you support, whatever methods, it takes to convert people
go away, sicko
i am getting a teacher from a school to read this topic too
hope we can spread awareness against this insanity
-
i hope you are not masturbating about this topic about pedophilia, you sicko
lets all get back to the topic at hand
just in case you think this topic was created to flame Christians, do know that TS (honeybunz) is a Christian too
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
but you support, whatever methods, it takes to convert people
go away, sicko
i am getting a teacher from a school to read this topic too
hope we can spread awareness against this insanity
Huh, now go hide under a teacher's skirt?
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Huh, now go hide under a teacher's skirt?
wah, so many other points to respond to, can only say hide under teacher's skirt?
epic phail
it shows you can only make ad hominem arguments rather than substantiated ones
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
i hope you are not masturbating about this topic about pedophilia, you sicko
lets all get back to the topic at hand
just in case you think this topic was created to flame Christians, do know that TS (honeybunz) is a Christian too
No need to drag honeybunz in. He's asking for prayers for the convicted evangelists' sins.
What's wrong with you? I did not say that he flame Christians. Just you!
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
wah, so many other points to respond to, can only say hide under teacher's skirt?
epic phail
it shows you can only make ad hominem arguments rather than substantiated ones
You are mocking yourself.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
No need to drag honeybunz in. He's asking for prayers for the convicted evangelists' sins.
What's wrong with you? I did not say that he flame Christians. Just you!
she
i am not dragging, so you are wrong
i also didnt say you said that
this is warning..do you even go out much??
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
You are mocking yourself.
definitely not
i always come to this conclusion when i have exhaustively point out why the other party is wrong, plus pointing out why his or her reaction is unbecoming
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Sahih Bukhari volume 7, book 62, number 88
Narrated ‘Ursa:
The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).I am still not sure personally what to make of Muhammad's marriage to Aisha when she was that young. We can deduce the information in two ways:
1. Conclude that Muhammad is a pedophile
2. Any perceived embarrassment of the marriage comes from reconciling normal practices of the ancient world with the social values of the modern worldMuslim scholars however use the example of the marriage to deduce:
1. That a marriage contract can be written up anytime voluntarily but its execution will be suspended unless both the bride and groom are confirmed legally capable, i.e sane, the onset of puberty, etc.
2. Arranged marriages and bethrothal of children are subsumed under the category of urf, custom since not all Muslim societies practice it.Urf has a valid basis for a legal decision, formulated in light of prevailing customs and for the most part changeable due to social change. Nowadays the minimum age of marriage is 16, 18, 21. If a Muslim wants to take a child-bride, he may be prevented to do so since having a young bride today means very differently than when it was practiced a hundred or thousand years ago.
It's incredible news for convicted paedophiles. Birds of the same feather flock together.
Ack, maybe we happen to share somewhat of the same feathers too googoomuck, some Christian priests and ministers themselves are convicted pedophiles in prison or else protected by the Church from criminal prosecution. It'll be a good burn to hear the pedo insults from a Buddhist, Hindu or Atheist, not currently from this Christian.
-
We must also conclude that evangelists spreading the gospel to school children outside of their school compound is similar to pedophiles stalking children, as in both instances, the children are without adult protection.
-
Originally posted by Gauze:
Ack, maybe we happen to share somewhat of the same feathers too googoomuck, some Christian priests and ministers themselves are convicted pedophiles in prison or else protected by the Church from criminal prosecution. It'll be a good burn to hear the pedo insults from a Buddhist, Hindu or Atheist, not currently from this Christian.
True though
Compare real actions and support for such actions against just a few lines in a book. Which would you be scared of?
Strangely, i read similar comparison in King Henry II's remarks against John I.
-
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
We must also conclude that evangelists spreading the gospel to school children outside of their school compound is similar to pedophiles stalking children, as in both instances, the children are without adult protection.
Action alone is hideous, but support for such an action by a believer who attempt (but failed) to lay it onto another religion
One word - aghast
-
Originally posted by Gauze:
Ack, maybe we happen to share somewhat of the same feathers too googoomuck, some Christian priests and ministers themselves are convicted pedophiles in prison or else protected by the Church from criminal prosecution. It'll be a good burn to hear the pedo insults from a Buddhist, Hindu or Atheist, not currently from this Christian.
These Christian Priests or ministers belong to same feathers alright. They flock together in jail.
-
Originally posted by Gauze:
I am still not sure personally what to make of Muhammad's marriage to Aisha when she was that young. We can deduce the information in two ways:
1. Conclude that Muhammad is a pedophile
2. Any perceived embarrassment of the marriage comes from reconciling normal practices of the ancient world with the social values of the modern worldMuslim scholars however use the example of the marriage to deduce:
1. That a marriage contract can be written up anytime voluntarily but its execution will be suspended unless both the bride and groom are confirmed legally capable, i.e sane, the onset of puberty, etc.
2. Arranged marriages and bethrothal of children are subsumed under the category of urf, custom since not all Muslim societies practice it.Urf has a valid basis for a legal decision, formulated in light of prevailing customs and for the most part changeable due to social change. Nowadays the minimum age of marriage is 16, 18, 21. If a Muslim wants to take a child-bride, he may be prevented to do so since having a young bride today means very differently than when it was practiced a hundred or thousand years ago.
Any country that practices strict sharia law today still sanction paedophilia.
It's halal.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Any country that practices strict sharia law today still sanction paedophilia.
It's halal.
better than a group of people who put it into an action by stalking school kids outside the schools
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
better than a group of people who put it into an action by stalking school kids outside the schools
Sanction paedophilia is the way to go?
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Sanction paedophilia is the way to go?
i guess so
i mean, if they can stalk sch kids, i am sure they can say their church sanction it
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
i guess so
i mean, if they can stalk sch kids, i am sure they can say their church sanction it
I said Sharia law and don't pretend that you don't know Sharia Law.
You know Christian churches do not sanction paedophilia. You know Sharia law sanction it.
You are for paedophilia - sexual prefence for prepubescent children.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
I said Sharia law and don't pretend that you don't know Sharia Law.
You know Christian churches do not sanction paedophilia. You know Sharia law sanction it.
You are for paedophilia - sexual prefence for prepubescent children.
i dont know about sharia law, sanctions
what i know is, people put their perverted thoughts into actions, and there are other who support them, like for example, stalking school kids
what a sick world
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
i dont know about sharia law, sanctions
what i know is, people put their perverted thoughts into actions, and there are other who support them, like for example, stalking school kids
what a sick world
You don't know about sharia law but know people can put perverted thoughts into action.
What else you do not know? You don't know what sexual preference for prepubescent children too? Is that why you are for sanctioning paedophilia? Because you don't know what paedophilia is?
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
You don't know about sharia law but know people can put perverted thoughts into action.
What else you do not know? You don't know what sexual preference for prepubescent children too? Is that why you are for sanctioning paedophilia? Because you don't know what paedophilia is?
i think you should stop supporting pedophilia in guise of evangelism, kinda sick u noe
yeah, perverted thoughts put into action, more sickening and scarier than few lines in a book
geez a wheez, scary world
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
i think you should stop supporting pedophilia in guise of evangelism, kinda sick u noe
yeah, perverted thoughts put into action, more sickening and scarier than few lines in a book
geez a wheez, scary world
Feign ignorance? Playing dumb here?
Sure you can do better than that!
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Feign ignorance? Playing dumb here?
Sure you can do better than that!
this is nice, coming from someone who state that people who are against pedophilia are blaspheming religion
and given points laid out by myself, fudgester and HZ, you choose to ignore them and go around stating irrelevant remarks like 'blashpheming religion'and 'feigning ignorance
i wonder what will it make you to respond to points and not resorting to this sort of callous remarks
hmm
-
by the way, why are you so intent on discussing about pedophilia, i mean besides the reason you support such behaviour?
i dont think in this topic the couple also evangelise to young kids leh, or there are something we do not know???
-
100th..