Misled Evanglists. Let's pray for their sins
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
if, and if they have any conscience
You have blaspheme the wrong religion with your own words!
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Whatever he quoted isn't even in the Quran, and Sunan Al-Nasai's book of hadith is considered even less strong than Sahih Bukhari.
And it's not lost on me that he chose to ignore the next part of what I said about taking things in context, and about the different methods other scholars used.
He sure needs some self-reflection.
Oh, you want more?!
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Oh, you want more?!
Nopes.
But you do need more self-reflection.
I have no quarrel with Christianity.
I only find it sad that you choose to have one with Islam.
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Whatever he quoted isn't even in the Quran, and Sunan Al-Nasai's book of hadith is considered even less strong than Sahih Bukhari.
And it's not lost on me that he chose to ignore the next part of what I said about taking things in context, and about the different methods other scholars used.
He sure needs some self-reflection.
Totally agree
My pet peeve, as written in another thread, was that nobody take or read their scriptures with wisdom, approach them in a deeper meaningful way and even vet what they themselves present to the public
I cant believe that as outsider, i can even catch them for blasphemising their own religion
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
You have blaspheme the wrong religion with your own words!
Instead of focusing on points at hand, you choose to divert by wringing in pointless remarks
Typical
*shrugs*
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Nopes.
But you do need more self-reflection.
I have no quarrel with Christianity.
I only find it sad that you choose to have one with Islam.
I find it sad that he chose to divert away from the topic at hand
I think the court all along has been fair to all religious groups, even in the case of members of a church park their cars along the road of the housing estate, causing obstructions to the residents, resulting in one of them barging into the church during a prayer service, was also subsequently charged the same way
despite much fairness at hand, believers choose to vent their frustrations by flaming other religious group
i just wonder
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Nopes.
But you do need more self-reflection.
I have no quarrel with Christianity.
I only find it sad that you choose to have one with Islam.
Response deleted.
Wrong reply! I thought it was laurence.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
....and you with Christianity!
he didnt
stop diverting from the questions we posed and advice we are giving you
you are losing it, arent you?
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Instead of focusing on points at hand, you choose to divert by wringing in pointless remarks
Typical
*shrugs*
Whatever.
You asked for proof and if you have googled, you would have found it yourself.
So, what pointless remarks?
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I find it sad that he chose to divert away from the topic at hand
I think the court all along has been fair to all religious groups, even in the case of members of a church park their cars along the road of the housing estate, causing obstructions to the residents, resulting in one of them barging into the church during a prayer service, was also subsequently charged the same way
despite much fairness at hand, believers choose to vent their frustrations by flaming other religious group
i just wonder
That's what you are doing, flaming Christianity.
That's OK. No Christian will put a price on your head for speaking ill of Christianity.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Whatever.
You asked for proof and if you have googled, you would have found it yourself.
So, what pointless remarks?
Means you dont have right? Allright, no point glossing over missing evidence, if they do exist in the first place
That remark i quoted was pointless to discussion
I dont see why i should quote and you trying to be blind and ask me what pointless remarks
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
That's what you are doing, flaming Christianity.
That's OK. No Christian will put a price on your head for speaking ill of Christianity.
Like how?
Wow, talking about a court ruling is flaming christianity
Of course no christian will put a price on me, because i didnt speak ill of christianity in the first place
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Means you dont have right? Allright, no point glossing over missing evidence, if they do exist in the first place
That remark i quoted was pointless to discussion
I dont see why i should quote and you trying to be blind and ask me what pointless remarks
You are calling Christian evangelists outside school compounds paedophiles. No?
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
You are calling Christian evangelists outside school compounds paedophiles. No?
They shouldnt be stalking school-going children, no?
What did our school education last time warn us about strangers??
-
Weird, i asked for proof on the statement about you trying to link Islam to pedophilia
And then you turn around to ask about Christian evangelists and pedophiles
Err, are you ok??
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
They shouldnt be stalking school-going children, no?
What did our school education last time warn us about strangers??
You've called them paedophiles. Stalking is your choice of word now.
If the method of evangelism is upsetting people, it's still evangelism.
Otherwise how do certain sales person who approach people in similar ways earn their living?
Anyway, the school principal has made his point. If that's illegal and these evangelists still want to be irritants, the police will step in.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
You've called them paedophiles. Stalking is your choice of word now.
If the method of evangelism is upsetting people, it's still evangelism.
Otherwise how do certain sales person who approach people in similar ways earn their living?
Anyway, the school principal has made his point. If that's illegal and these evangelists still want to be irritants, the police will step in.
You stand outside of schools, you pounce on sch kids when they come out of the school
It is stalking, not my choice, it is the most apt word
And your second line...are you so supportive of pedophilia, whatever it takes to convert innocent young kids? Omg, then they are worse than those few lines in a book, because they are the very one who take actions....yucks, disgusting, pooi
Your last line doesnt make sense, are you saying that if you can get away with things like stealing, you will still do it? Just because no one say or do anything??
-
let me summarise in a few words
omg the horror the horror!~!~!~!
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
Weird, i asked for proof on the statement about you trying to link Islam to pedophilia
And then you turn around to ask about Christian evangelists and pedophiles
Err, are you ok??
Don't beat around the bush. You've called Christian evangelists paedophiles. Are they?
You've read how I put my words. Then you ask for proof. It's in the news. Now it's in the internet. Convicted paedophiles are true paedophiles. It's a fact that some have converted to Islam. It's a fact that the prophet had married a six-year old girl.
Christian evangelists are not paedophiles.
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
You stand outside of schools, you pounce on sch kids when they come out of the school
It is stalking, not my choice, it is the most apt word
And your second line...are you so supportive of pedophilia, whatever it takes to convert innocent young kids? Omg, then they are worse than those few lines in a book, because they are the very one who take actions....yucks, disgusting, pooi
Your last line doesnt make sense, are you saying that if you can get away with things like stealing, you will still do it? Just because no one say or do anything??
Is that it? Yuck, disgusting, pooi?
Can you define your understanding of paedophilia? Is evangeling outside school compund means they are paedophiles?
I can also pooi what . I can also say yuck,disgusting pooi. -
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Don't beat around the bush. You've called Christian evangelists paedophiles. Are they?
You've read how I put my words. Then you ask for proof. It's in the news. Now it's in the internet. Convicted paedophiles are true paedophiles. It's a fact that some have converted to Islam. It's a fact that the prophet had married a six-year old girl.
Christian evangelists are not paedophiles.
I never did, in fact it was you who diverted the topic, because you didnt respond to every point me and fudgester made, either ignoring points like he pointed out or saying pointless remarks like simi blashpeming religion when my response to herzog zwei about pedophiles and their remarks
if saying pedophiles dont have conscience is blaspheming religion, i got nothing to say sia
pedophiles dont have to be convicted, you are putting conviction, charges and scots-free all into one sentence
besides, whats the pointing out lines in a book, thats not even the Quran itself, when you are so supportive of whatever means it takes to evangelise
i am so disappointed in you
has your morals been eaten by the dogs????
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
Is that it? Yuck, disgusting, pooi?
Can you define your understanding of paedophilia? Is evangeling outside school compund means they are paedophiles?
I can also pooi what . I can also say
yuck,disgusting pooi. leave the children alone
they are innocent, and should be kept away from weird strangers at such a young age
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
I never did, in fact it was you who diverted the topic, because you didnt respond to every point me and fudgester made, either ignoring points like he pointed out or saying pointless remarks like simi blashpeming religion when my response to herzog zwei about pedophiles and their remarks
if saying pedophiles dont have conscience is blaspheming religion, i got nothing to say sia
pedophiles dont have to be convicted, you are putting conviction, charges and scots-free all into one sentence
besides, whats the pointing out lines in a book, thats not even the Quran itself, when you are so supportive of whatever means it takes to evangelise
i am so disappointed in you
has your morals been eaten by the dogs????
You never did what?
Oh, I respond to Fudjester if he replies.
Pedophiles dont have to be convicted?
-
Originally posted by laurence82:
leave the children alone
they are innocent, and should be kept away from weird strangers at such a young age
I never fuck children. Never!
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
You never did what?
Oh, I respond to Fudjester if he replies.
Pedophiles dont have to be convicted?
he did, you didnt, when he said you are ignoring the point he made
yeah, they dont have to be convicted, hence we call it scots-free
you realli think police is 100% efficient in catching all the pedohiles in the world right?