Originally posted by Chin Eng:cannot say anything else 'cos I'd be deemed to be "autocratic"?
no lah, it will not be like the other forum lah. I am not so controversial....and I don't date the other forumers.
you seriously dunno ah?Originally posted by Icemoon:which other forum?
Originally posted by ben1xy:
what about the movie and eating popcorn with chopstick. i saw ok!
Go and flame the other forums like you do in EH and see if the statistics changes. Anyway AEN has already stated that there are closed threads in Buddhism. So your numbers are not too accurately. You will, of course, state that there is a better reason there than here.... moderator's prerogative. Don't owe you any explanation.Threads are v rarely closed in my forum actually... but partly to do with not receiving as much flamings as EH. Personal insults, and 'adult content' like wat Ito posted.. I just edit their post so they wont affect the topic's discussion... and fortunately I dont have do that often as well.
Unker ... not funny leh ... anyhow scare peopleOriginally posted by Chin Eng:Petition for a removal of mod, if you wish. I won't stop you, because whining about it here isn't going to change a thing as I really cannot take your concerns seriously.
democracy lah.... if peeps think that mod is not good, can always vote him out, otherwise sillyme also kena accused of being autocratic. definitely not funny but I can't help laughing.Originally posted by vince69:Unker ... not funny leh ... anyhow scare people
As I'd said, EH is probably the most flamed religious forum, so the higher lock threads is probably expected, but as I'd said everyone is entitled to his opinion as to why the mods here lock threads. Nonetheless, moderators' prerogative and privilege.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Threads are v rarely closed in my forum actually... but partly to do with not receiving as much flamings as EH. Personal insults, and 'adult content' like wat Ito posted.. I just edit their post so they wont affect the topic's discussion.
then how ... go back to the old days of the wild wild west ???Originally posted by Chin Eng:democracy lah.... if peeps think that mod is not good, can always vote him out, otherwise sillyme also kena accused of being autocratic. definitely not funny but I can't help laughing.
turn Lau82 into 'gorang pisang'Originally posted by laurence82:put a thread titled 'quality of mods IV'?
or 'chin eng had company'
or best, 'normination' of new moderators, and lets have an 'erection'
Let's say we have mac, kfc, bk (my fav), long john silver (my fav too), and mosburger. For some reason, mac keep getting strong comments, keep being in the media for the not-so-good reasons, is there something amissed with Mac?Originally posted by Chin Eng:As I'd said, EH is probably the most flamed religious forum, so the higher lock threads is probably expected, but as I'd said everyone is entitled to his opinion as to why the mods here lock threads. Nonetheless, moderators' prerogative and privilege.
oh please, i received threats about blending me, frying me, smashing me up, flambe, etc etcOriginally posted by vince69:turn Lau82 into 'gorang pisang'
you know, I fully agree with you on this point.Originally posted by sonic_16:If you feel that your forum kept getting flamed, perhaps there is something about the way the queries are replied, opinions are discussed, hence causing it to be flammed. Or maybe there are something about the behaviour about EHians.
maybe the peeps here prefer the old days of the wild wild west.... let's not discount this...Originally posted by vince69:then how ... go back to the old days of the wild wild west ???
I agree. However there are many who are not willing to boycott EH...Originally posted by :Best way to tackle autocracy is not to support it lor........
Just boycott it. It cannot stand without support from the masses!
not again, I hope...Originally posted by Chin Eng:maybe the peeps here prefer the old days of the wild wild west.... let's not discount this...
so simply put: remove the sheriff.
Originally posted by stupidissmart:If u look at tis religious forum and others, u will realise tat in here there is a surprisingly great amount of threads being locked for the slightest of reason. I do a rough count and approximately 20% of the threads r locked just because the moderator do not like them. For the other forums, the only reason why a thread is lock is simply because they r afraid it will span more than 99 pages and cause a problem to the forum. Some of the examples r buddhist (0 locked) light of atlantis (0 locked) deeper truth (0 locked).
I think it is sad to see tat the moderators have become the ultimate judges on deciding whether is a discussion is good to his eyes or not. If the thread is silly, it will die off itself and there is no need for locking. If the discussion ends up in flame war, it should only be locked when it actually happened. We should know tat power of moderator acts like censorship and can be abused. At wat stage then is it consider as being abused ?
About me and my points on evolution and ID, I think it should be noted tat I did not start these arguments in the first place. It is always some guys who start to give a total biased view of their stand. When I reply to it, they fantastically get chopped off abruptly. Why does the "moderation" always started after I reply and not when someone making a stupid stand, I don't know. U mean the same stupid misconception stand of some people here doesn't sound repeatative ? If u don't fell like reading, don't read. It doesn't means just because u do not like to read it then it has to be censored off.
Anyway I am busy and do not want to post heavily as before. However if there is some threads tat r misrepresented I have to write something to it. One issue which I am particular about is mis representation of science and logic.
as was written a couple of post back. if the mods lack support, the structure will collapse... therefore if the mods are doing a good job, speak out, if the mods suck, remove them (unfortunately, you cannot remove sillyme, so it's really only just me)Originally posted by vince69:not again, I hope...
since when has SIS played fair?Originally posted by laoda99:To be fair....
Ok. See u in 14 mins time.Originally posted by laurence82:I am going to boycott this forum for 14 mins
yah lor ... yah lor ...Originally posted by Chin Eng:as was written a couple of post back. if the mods lack support, the structure will collapse... therefore if the mods are doing a good job, speak out, if the mods suck, remove them (unfortunately, you cannot remove sillyme, so it's really only just me)