No comments. I'm not familiar with their line of argument. Well, but many of them certainly say that God (Jesus) cannot sin.Originally posted by Pope Nicholas:The prot arguments (i dont even think this is classical protestnatism) fails as if Christ was pure divine, his fastings in the desert will be meaningless as he cannot hunger. His death on the cross was painless as he can feel no pain. Christ was not in any sense human as he was purely divine......
It is not extreme. It is kinda most illogical.Originally posted by Pope Nicholas:I dont see how is proto-orthodox viewpoint more extreme to docetism or adoptionism.
Yes. Eternal Hope, a sub-forum in sgForums, is where Christian topics are discussed.Originally posted by mrwonderful:one man's hell is another man's heaven.
btw is this a christian forum??
Going by what you say, and I hope if you are willing to make this argument you would apply it to yourself:Originally posted by NotFromVenus:Most people don't hate god , they hate the things people do who think they represent god in what they do.
Think about it.
Can you hate the sea? can you hate the land you are standing on?
Can you even hate the sky above you? How to hate God?
How so?Originally posted by Icemoon:It is not extreme. It is kinda most illogical.
i know one born-abnormal guy who is ugly but loves god.Originally posted by Agenda:because of comments like..
people who hate god are borned ugly
Depending on when you take the 'survey'. There was no bible then, and since others also read similar writings with the proto-orthodox, it is hard to say who is proto-orthodox and who is not. It is like arminians and calvinists today.Originally posted by Pope Nicholas:How so?
Seems most early christians were proto-orthodox. Only the gnostics held the docetism view.