According to the English .. it is not clear. I went to check the chinese translation, the wording also ambiguous.Originally posted by Chin Eng:I still don't get it.....
I still think the Mary had sexual relationship with Joseph after the birth of Christ.
Neither does it (Scripture) tear it (the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary) down ....Originally posted by Icemoon:According to the English .. it is not clear. I went to check the chinese translation, the wording also ambiguous.
My argument is that it does not support the perpetual virginity of Mary.
exactly, which is why I'd said that it is not important, because the focus of Scripture is NOT ABOUT MARY!Originally posted by vince69:Neither does it (Scripture) tear it (the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary) down ....
yes please... thank you ...Originally posted by Chin Eng:exactly, which is why I'd said that it is not important, because the focus of Scripture is NOT ABOUT MARY!
if there is no discussion scientology, may I close this thread?