Jesus is not the FatherJesus is God himself right.... so I assume the validity of the website is void?
God's words show that Jesus was not an incarnation of the Father. If Jesus had been, then it would have been more accurate for God to say "This is an incarnation of myself. I am pleased with myself."
God is three distinct persons.Originally posted by mhcampboy:Just finding more knowledge about Jesus when I stumbled on this website. The information seems legitimate and website, real.
Until I came upon this paragraph.
Jesus is God himself right.... so I assume the validity of the website is void?
http://www.lifeofchrist.com/life/johnthebaptist/baptism.asp
Already did.Originally posted by laoda99:God is three distinct persons.
Campy, I suggest u attend classes in your own church regarding the trinity. Mebbe u can join those pre-baptism classes which gives u a study in Christology and other essential beliefs in Christianity.
My pre-baptism class helped me a lot.
Your view is heretical. In fact it is the Sabellian heresy during the early years.Originally posted by mhcampboy:Just finding more knowledge about Jesus when I stumbled on this website. The information seems legitimate and website, real.
Until I came upon this paragraph.
Jesus is God himself right.... so I assume the validity of the website is void?
http://www.lifeofchrist.com/life/johnthebaptist/baptism.asp
http://www.exchangedlife.com/Sermons/topical/trinity/heresies1.shtml/
Monarchianism
This is also called Modalism or the Sabellian heresy. Noetus of Smyrna first proposed this doctrine at the end of the second century, beginning of the third century. Modalistic Monarchian doctrine was accepted and popularized by Sabellius at the beginning of the third century. Sabellius was excommunicated in Rome for this teaching. Modalism teaches that the Trinity is one God revealed in one person or mode. The Father is the Son, is the Holy Spirit. They are all different temporary modes of the same God. Modalism/Monarchian doctrine usually did not deny the deity of Christ; instead they claim that the Son is the Father, not the eternal Son as part of historic Christianity.
Many church fathers wrote detailed responses against this doctrine (as we saw in the previous section). One term coined for those who held this heresy was 'Patripassianists' because they taught that the Father suffered on the cross. Other sects teach that Jesus was only a man who received power from God. Noetus, Praxeas, and Sabellius were the prominent teachers of this heresy.
The church responds:
Tertullian criticized this view in his theological argument against Praxeas:
“We define that there are two, the Father and the Son, and three with the Holy Spirit, and this number is made by the pattern of salvation...[which] brings about unity in trinity, interrelating the three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are of one substance and power, because there is one God from whom these degrees, forms and kinds devolve in the name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” (Against Praxeas p. 156-7).
I think they try to explain what they can.Originally posted by mhcampboy:Already did.
I have no problems with the Trinity. Im just asking abt the validity of the website.
Yes I agree with Icemoon it sound Sabeliian.Originally posted by Icemoon:Your view is heretical. In fact it is the Sabellian heresy during the early years.
I don't suggest attending classes in church. As shown, you did not learn enough to make a decision about the website.Originally posted by mhcampboy:Already did.
I have no problems with the Trinity. Im just asking abt the validity of the website.
At least my church taught me properly about trinity and other Christian beliefs before I was baptised.Originally posted by Icemoon:I don't suggest attending classes in church. As shown, you did not learn enough to make a decision about the website.
The best is to read the heresies regarding the Trinity. Read the history. Read the refutations by the church fathers. If you never study the history, you are doomed to repeat it.
Take my advice.....you have got two forummers saying ur views look like Sabellian liao......you said:"Jesus is God himself right"Originally posted by mhcampboy:Tsk. What my view? Its not my view. Im just quoting from the website.
and my last Trinity post is not abt God. Its abt the naming of the word trinity. not abt god.. geeesh...
Before you are baptised they teach you about Sabellianism liao.Originally posted by laoda99:At least my church taught me properly about trinity and other Christian beliefs before I was baptised.
I never read the website just the chunk you quoted. I see nothing wrong.Originally posted by mhcampboy:Tsk. What my view? Its not my view. Im just quoting from the website.
and my last Trinity post is not abt God. Its abt the naming of the word trinity. not abt god.. geeesh...
The things we were taught are very clear. They do not try to confuse us with Sabellianism and other heresies. I firmly believe before one is baptised he need to know what is essential. Otherwise u will be reciting the Apostle's Creed with no understanding at all.Originally posted by Icemoon:Before you are baptised they teach you about Sabellianism liao.
bu2 kui4 shi4 John Knox de descendants.Originally posted by laoda99:The things we were taught are very clear. They do not try to confuse us with Sabellianism and other heresies. I firmly believe before one is baptised he need to know what is essential. Otherwise u will be reciting the Apostle's Creed with no understanding at all.
Hmmm......that class was a refresher course for her.....she has no problems understanding....Originally posted by Icemoon:bu2 kui4 shi4 John Knox de descendants.
how .. your girlfriend got learn during that class or not?
Cool down....We never say u are heretic...but when u said "Jesus is God himself" you may have a problem understanding the trinity....Originally posted by mhcampboy:wait a minute.. i stand on ground when sum1 calls me or view me as a heretic!!
u to call me tat... u know how does tat makes me feel!!?
anyway... so wad ive been taught is wrong? Jesus is not God reincarnate(dunno if im using correct word)??
erggh.. again i use the wrong wording!!Originally posted by laoda99:Cool down....We never say u are heretic...but when u said "Jesus is God himself" you may have a problem understanding the trinity....
What have u been taught in bible classes abt trinity may I ask?
ok...read this link....Originally posted by mhcampboy:erggh.. again i use the wrong wording!!
wad i meant to say is... holy father and jesus is still one GOD!
No lah .. I was talking about the course where they teach you about the Trinity. As in how deep did the teacher go.Originally posted by laoda99:Hmmm......that class was a refresher course for her.....she has no problems understanding....
I would use the Apostle's CreedOriginally posted by Icemoon:No lah .. I was talking about the course where they teach you about the Trinity. As in how deep did the teacher go.
Like .. if I ask you to describe to me the Trinity in one short paragraph, can you do it?