I don't see the wrong.Originally posted by ben1xy:it's a tautology. but how do u see the wrongs in his statement though? i think he makes sense honestly
fair enoughOriginally posted by Icemoon:I don't see the wrong.
I only can't see the right.
I have no problem with that part. It is like asking the question - how many angels did God create? Obviously we dunno the answer .. and only God knows.Originally posted by ben1xy:fair enough
he did say he didn't know the answer at the beginning though. makes me wonder why he tried answering it later.
*shrugs*
Well lets roll back and look at our assumption.Originally posted by vince69:God knows the answer and He is sure He have the correct answer.
We thought we know the answer, but are we sure we have the correct answer?
(till the result is announced, we can never be sure if we really knows the correct answer)
the author?Originally posted by ben1xy:fair enough
he did say he didn't know the answer at the beginning though. makes me wonder why he tried answering it later.
*shrugs*
very artistic.Originally posted by ceecookie:What's Christianity's stand against those people who pierce their body as a form of art as shown in Art Centrel juz now?
My first reaction is... OUCH... sorry, don't like needlesOriginally posted by ceecookie:What's Christianity's stand against those people who pierce their body as a form of art as shown in Art Centrel juz now?
Your reply to my post?Originally posted by vince69:My first reaction is... OUCH... sorry, don't like needles
He replied to ceecookie.....Originally posted by davidche:Your reply to my post?
lol,Originally posted by M©+square:He replied to ceecookie.....
That's why Vince quoted ceecookie.
How did you percieve that vince was replying to you?
wad for????Originally posted by davidche:lol,
actually, no, im asking for his reply to my post.
oorr... ok... sorry.Originally posted by vince69:tact as in tactical lah, not tactful, not tag (as in WWE)
tactical as in you as why Dave said its stupid and Mc asked why he said its good...
consciousOriginally posted by ben1xy:it's good that we have a recent "type good english" campaign here at EH. makes me more conscientious of what i type
By definition a Christian stand is something that you'd have base on what you understand from the Bible.Originally posted by davidche:very artistic.
Well i am a christian and since you are looking for the christians' stand....
congrats... ang moh suddenly improve so muchOriginally posted by laurence82:conscious of what i type
conscientious in what i type
finally i remembered
but then
GRADUATE LOH!
nabeizOriginally posted by Chin Eng:congrats... ang moh suddenly improve so much
...i think most folks here in EH are capable of writing well, it's just that many couldn't be bothered.
Originally posted by laurence82:conscious of what i type
conscientious in what i type
finally i remembered
but then
GRADUATE LOH!
no moreOriginally posted by ben1xy:
no more exams?
congrats!Originally posted by laurence82:no more
that's my point.... his wasn't intentional. One can always tell....Originally posted by laurence82:nabeiz
actually nobody takes notice till david comes in though
Originally posted by Chin Eng:God has the answer .. to what question?
oorr... ok... sorry.
back to topic...
rereading the site, I am seeing the following:
1. Mr Sankaran HAS TO deal with this question: [b]Who created God? For a site intended to answer basic Christian question, it will come up. Whether he is capable in answering this question or not is another question.
2. He said he does not know the answer. Honest enough.
3. So he ask another question: Who knows the answer? Obviously no one human has this answer. Then who has? Only God has the answer.
4. I don't see any inferences in whether is was God who created God, or someone created God, or that God had a beginning.... only that God has the answer, and the concluding statement is: we'd rather have God on our side when we ask this question than God not on our side when we meet Him.
personally, I don't see anything wrong with the answers that Mr Sankaran had given, it's simplistic, yes, and may not appeal to those who want a higher level of philosophy, but it don't think that it was his intention to engage anyone for a high level philosophical discussion.
if it's anything else, I think that it is more orthodox than many Christian websites in some foreign land.[/b]
Ok.. now I am confused...Originally posted by Icemoon:God has the answer .. to what question?
I regret to say most people who are seeking answer are more intelligent than that. Just think, if you are not intelligent, you won't even ask such a philosophical question.
There is something wrong with his answer because we all know the answer (the standard answer) that is different from his answer. If we all know the answer, how come no-one knows the answer?
No one created God. And we all have the answer, not only God.Originally posted by Chin Eng:Ok.. now I am confused...
I thought the original question was "who created God"?
So what is the standard answer?
Icey is refering to the answer most people will give to this questionOriginally posted by Chin Eng:Ok.. now I am confused...
I thought the original question was "who created God"?
So what is the standard answer?