Does it help in giving absolute answers?Originally posted by davidche:it helps
not suffering?Originally posted by davidche:So ppl ask why did God create sufferings??
to answer this question, can i first know wad is the opposite of suffering pls??
God didnt create sufferings. God created heavens & the earth plus all the inhabitants. It's satan & human collaborators who create so much suffering on planet earth & in heaven & hell.Originally posted by davidche:So ppl ask why did God create sufferings??
to answer this question, can i first know wad is the opposite of suffering pls??
Suffering & yet filled with joy?Originally posted by davidche:Another thing no one has ansered me, in the realm of sufferings, is there anything out of suffering and non suffering??
To make it clearer, is there any other fruits beside apple and grapes in the realm of fruits?
what is non suffering? Care to eleborate more?Originally posted by davidche:good!! you understand!!
and mc, i hope you understand y i asked the questions.
Well ok. But isnt there a better alternative so that there is happiness without ever suffering? I guess too late already...Originally posted by davidche:well, tats not counted......so heres the one sentance explaination that you guys have been waiting for......
If there is no suffering, wld there be non-suffering?
my statement wld only work if there is only two 'substance' in the realmOriginally posted by M©+square:what is non suffering? Care to eleborate more?
I hope you could explain further so that i could understand cos i really want to understand your views.
it is doubtful that you have proven any of your intelligence by the looks of your replies... a mocker and name caller is certainly not intelligent. All you have shown is your lack of upbringing and character.Originally posted by NUS_Superst@r:If there is no idiot like davidche, will there be intelligent ppl like me?
If there is no suffering, wld there be non-suffering?Tat is stupid. If there is no suffering, it is non-suffering. It is not "would there be non-suffering", it simply lead us to the state we want to go, tat is non-suffering. no suffering=non-suffering. As such, it is still cruel to have suffering in tis world tat lead us from non-suffering
my statement wld only work if there is only two 'substance' in the realmObviously your assumption is wrong. Even the words u used already show tat non-suffering is the absence of suffering
1st part1st part
non-suffering is the opp of suffering.
So under the circumstance that there r only suffering and nonsuffering...
we know that if there is no suffering, there wldnt be non-suffering
2nd partU need to convince me tat non-suffering r extreme end. Things can go like negative or positive, or like heat, absence of a substance. If u wanna claim tat suffering is like negative and positive, u have to show it, othewise it simply look like heat, and non-suffering is the absence of suffering.
Ok,...from your upper posts i can see that you dont understand this principal.
If there no sad or anger wld there be happiness??
Happiness wld be merely a normalty.