ok .. smart alec .. tell us what happened to the 5ml?Originally posted by davidche:yes. one wld be when two substances r added together, for example 50ml of water and 50ml of fruit juice, the total amt will be equal to 95ml.
electron clouds can be observed. wat they mean is to see the atom as though it is a grapeOriginally posted by Icemoon:this is misleading.
anything that has mass and occupies space is not invisible scientifically.
no pic no talk.Originally posted by davidche:1) angels r created beings:
For by him[Jesus] all things were created:things in heaven and on earth, visisble and invisible, whether thrones or power or rulers or authourities; all things were created by him for him Col 1:16
2)Angels are spirit being:
Nowhere does the bible ever mention as it does about us, that angels have the 'image of God'Angels do not inherit salvation
"are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who inherit salvation?heb 1:14
3)Angels never die
"and in heaven we shall be like them in this respect" [the saved in heaven]can no longer die for they r like angels.luke 20:36
and alot more...................have to go to sleep
The photo I've shown .. the things inside like grape leh.Originally posted by NT2:electron clouds can be observed. wat they mean is to see the atom as though it is a grape
First, I am really from NUS. From faculty of engineering.Originally posted by davidche:r u really frm NUS??
Atoms r invisible even under a microscope. It is just a hypothesis made by scientists.
man, u're really proud of your Uni hor. i must learn from u !!Originally posted by NUS_Superst@r:First, I am really from NUS. From faculty of engineering.
And atom is not the building block of materials. According to current research, even electrons and protons can be broken down into smaller parts.
i only said about mine. I never said that your textbook is wrong did I. Secondary textbooks r of course lousier than olvl ones right??Originally posted by Icemoon:your textbook lousy .. what is the title?
My textbook is pure chemistry one endorsed by MOE.
Furthermore you can't prove a negative.
I have attached a [crude] photo of atoms .. what have you to say this time?
Still refuse to eat the humble pie?
Pure chem? Not sec two textbook meh?Originally posted by Icemoon:your textbook lousy .. what is the title?
My textbook is pure chemistry one endorsed by MOE.
Furthermore you can't prove a negative.
I have attached a [crude] photo of atoms .. what have you to say this time?
Still refuse to eat the humble pie?
Of course pure chem .. I was a triple science student ok.Originally posted by laurence82:Pure chem? Not sec two textbook meh?
hey .. please try to answer the question leh.Originally posted by davidche:i only said about mine. I never said that your textbook is wrong did I. Secondary textbooks r of course lousier than olvl ones right??
chill bro
Which year .. what major?Originally posted by NUS_Superst@r:First, I am really from NUS. From faculty of engineering.
And atom is not the building block of materials. According to current research, even electrons and protons can be broken down into smaller parts.
so he created hell, satan the rebellious angel cum devil and his rebellious nature? coolOriginally posted by davidche:1) angels r created beings:
For by him[Jesus] all things were created:things in heaven and on earth, visisble and invisible, whether thrones or power or rulers or authourities; all things were created by him for him Col 1:16
I remember seeing it in Sec Two textbook leh, when they first introduce atoms and molecules..Originally posted by Icemoon:Of course pure chem .. I was a triple science student ok.
maybe they use the same photo.Originally posted by laurence82:I remember seeing it in Sec Two textbook leh, when they first introduce atoms and molecules..
u r right. i dun own any textbooks.Originally posted by Icemoon:maybe they use the same photo.
anyway .. how come david and NT2 never seen it leh? Or they never read their textbook?
Its taken with some microscope right? I cant recall the type of microscope they used.Originally posted by Icemoon:maybe they use the same photo.
anyway .. how come david and NT2 never seen it leh? Or they never read their textbook?