Expository preaching on difficult passages in the Bible
-
Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
-
Google is your friend.Originally posted by laoda99:who is tommy barnett?
-
Are u a CK clone?Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
Saw u quarrel with those in Buddhism forum also.... -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
bio tech is not about evolution, mutation may be the correct term, and cloning is just one of the subject.
the debate on cloning is more towards the ethics side like what are the guidelines and boundaries. -
Every single thread is a potential flaming ground -
Please don't be so dramatic and no, I am in no way a clone. Lastly, I am not quarreling with anyone in the Buddhism forum, I just asked a question based on science. More often, I just can't stand people who teach intelligent creation rather evolution. I wonder which is more accurate? Experimentally proven facts or the Word of God?Originally posted by laoda99:Are u a CK clone?
Saw u quarrel with those in Buddhism forum also.... -
plus stem cells research tooOriginally posted by vince69:
bio tech is not about evolution, mutation may be the correct term, and cloning is just one of the subject.
the debate on cloning is more towards the ethics side like what are the guidelines and boundaries. -
you think they are worth two cents? I think they are worthless though.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though. 
-
evolution was never experimentally proven.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Please don't be so dramatic and no, I am in no way a clone. Lastly, I am not quarreling with anyone in the Buddhism forum, I just asked a question based on science. More often, I just can't stand people who teach intelligent creation rather evolution. I wonder which is more accurate? Experimentally proven facts or the Word of God? -
Yes u r not quarreling with anyone in the Buddhism forum. U R just seeking ans to clear ur doubts/misconceptions. U R always welcome in Buddhism forum.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Please don't be so dramatic and no, I am in no way a clone. Lastly, I am not quarreling with anyone in the Buddhism forum, I just asked a question based on science. More often, I just can't stand people who teach intelligent creation rather evolution. I wonder which is more accurate? Experimentally proven facts or the Word of God?
-
yes, stem cells too...Originally posted by laurence82:plus stem cells research too
-
Not to mentioned Mind Machine Interface, Computer Mind Interface,...etc.Originally posted by vince69:yes, stem cells too... -
all these bio techno stuff are best left to the governance of the medical ethic board to debate. one of the main debate (if I am not wrong) is the issues related to ethics, one of them (on stem cells/cloning research) is the rules/laws to protect the identity and privacy of the doner...etcOriginally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Not to mentioned Mind Machine Interface, Computer Mind Interface,...etc. -
Duh... Any stem cells or clone have to come from the patient, not from donors, due to cell incompartibility. So technically, there's no privacy to speak of. I am talking of religious bigotism that will definitely come from the forums and talks mentioned.Originally posted by vince69:all these bio techno stuff are best left to the governance of the medical ethic board to debate. one of the main debate (if I am not wrong) is the issues related to ethics, one of them (on stem cells/cloning research) is the rules/laws to protect the identity and privacy of the doner...etc -
So you think human lives and their accompanying intangible values are worthless?Originally posted by Icemoon:you think they are worth two cents? I think they are worthless though. -
can you even read?Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:So you think human lives and their accompanying intangible values are worthless?
I was referring to your comments, not human lives or any accompanying intangible values. -
the doners are those that donate for research purpose not for using on patients lah.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Duh... Any stem cells or clone have to come from the patient, not from donors, due to cell incompartibility. So technically, there's no privacy to speak of. I am talking of religious bigotism that will definitely come from the forums and talks mentioned. -
My posting:Originally posted by Icemoon:can you even read?
I was referring to your comments, not human lives or any accompanying intangible values.
Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
No one would use a useless technology. Science and technology are meant to serve the welfare of people, so you are referring to the value of people and the value of their lives. -
The real one is below (and my reply):Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:My posting:
Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
No one would use a useless technology. Science and technology are meant to serve the welfare of people, so you are referring to the value of people and the value of their lives.quote:
It looks like you are worse than worthless. You can't even see the worthless-ness, literally.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you think they are worth two cents? I think they are worthless though. -
I dun think u r fair in saying these becoz u have never attended Stephen Tong's seminars.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:My posting:
Hopefully, no one attends such a talk/preaching/ evangelism. Singapore is going to expand on biological based technologies. With the message that evolution and cloning are wrong, people will balk at Singapore's backwardness. Especially when bio based techs being taught as God's sole preogative. This is just my two cents though.
No one would use a useless technology. Science and technology are meant to serve the welfare of people, so you are referring to the value of people and the value of their lives.
And it is funny that u can "write" but not read English. -
sorry new here.
juz to clarify, Herzog_Zwei are u a chrisitian? -
Just an atheist.Originally posted by Mystix:sorry new here.
juz to clarify, Herzog_Zwei are u a chrisitian? -
to be more accurate, an atheist who cannot read his own reply.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Just an atheist. -
I really wonder why sometimes self professed students of science would strangely assume of an issue as "inappropriate" (say a Christian seminar or talk) when they themselves, have not even come to hear of it. What is so scienctific about such an approach ? Absurdly subjective at best.
-
Do you think cannibalism is good for human beings? May taste nice...Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Just an atheist.