She was, thank God she's not anymore!!Originally posted by vince69:she not part of Catholic church lah, so the Pope won't do anything to her...
No power...the archbishop of Canterbury is considered 'First amongst equals', but he has no power.Originally posted by laoda99:Think should have no power.....archbishop of canterbury looks like a nominal figure and he is pro-gay too....
not really, in this case, it may just had started at the top...Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:No power...the archbishop of Canterbury is considered 'First amongst equals', but he has no power.
Ah, you dont get these problems when you have centralised control!
Well, according to the article, Anglicans worldwide protested, and now it seems Rowan Williams is pro gay and yet he doesnt have power and authority..Originally posted by vince69:not really, in this case, it may just had started at the top...
links?Originally posted by laurence82:Well, according to the article, Anglicans worldwide protested, and now it seems Rowan Williams is pro gay and yet he doesnt have power and authority..
Kinda screwed up
By the way, it seems US Episcopal is not under the authority of the Archbishop
Look at wiki, all clergyman are to swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen...wouldnt be acceptable to the Amercians right?
wiki, if you look up anglicansOriginally posted by vince69:links?
lots of problem when u centralise control!Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:No power...the archbishop of Canterbury is considered 'First amongst equals', but he has no power.
Ah, you dont get these problems when you have centralised control!
You got study Organisation Structure and Design, read LKY's comments on the Vatican as a organisation and ObiterDicta's remarks in the RC forum?Originally posted by laoda99:lots of problem when u centralise control!
if the head falls the rest of the church go with him....
haha...unker vince like to gossip liao!!!Originally posted by vince69:off topic lah, Laoda not the subject of discussion here, we go lounge to talk about him later...
this should be done at the lounge, and no gossip please...Originally posted by laoda99:haha...unker vince like to gossip liao!!!
tsk tsk
nopeOriginally posted by laurence82:You got study Organisation Structure and Design, read LKY's comments on the Vatican as a organisation and ObiterDicta's remarks in the RC forum?
I read various articles on the Roman Catholic Church when the late John Paul II passed awayOriginally posted by laoda99:nope
care to enlighten me?
In terms of doctrinal issues and office politics, there are plenty of both, since Day 1 of the Church. The earliest recorded example of this in in Acts chapter 15 in the Bible.Originally posted by laurence82:I dont know about doctrinal issues and office politics, but the continuity and stability is there
In OSD term, they are very bureaucratic and centralised. But obiterdicta described the lower part of the organisation as quite organic and given some form of autonomy.
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=197993
Lee Kuan Yew once mentioned the Vatican because of its system that enable its continuity for centuries
do your westerners include england?Originally posted by ObiterDicta:I believe the day will come when the Asian and African bishops' conferences in the Anglican Communion will split from the heretical westerners, to return to a more authentic Biblical faith. In fact, some have already formed the Anglican Mission In America to re-evangelise the neo-pagan lands.
regards,
obiterdicta
I feel that females, being the SUPERIOR species, should be the SOLE gender to serve as clergy.Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:She was, thank God she's not anymore!!
On a side note,
Women cannot be priests nor bishops, but then again we don't recognise Anglican Holy Orders as valid.
Good riddance!
Superior species? you say until females and males are different species like that... do you instead means superior gender instead?Originally posted by iveco:I feel that females, being the SUPERIOR species, should be the SOLE gender to serve as clergy.
females are indeed superior. My chest is so small compared to theirs.Originally posted by vince69:Superior species? you say until females and males are different species like that... do you instead means superior gender instead?
"Sole" anagram to "Lose"Originally posted by iveco:I feel that females, being the SUPERIOR species, should be the SOLE gender to serve as clergy.
too bad ur feelings not considered by the churchOriginally posted by iveco:I feel that females, being the SUPERIOR species, should be the SOLE gender to serve as clergy.
Well, there's always the pastoral provision of the Anglican UseOriginally posted by ObiterDicta:I believe the day will come when the Asian and African bishops' conferences in the Anglican Communion will split from the heretical westerners, to return to a more authentic Biblical faith. In fact, some have already formed the Anglican Mission In America to re-evangelise the neo-pagan lands.
regards,
obiterdicta
Hmm, coming from an apostate and pagan, I'm not surprised.Originally posted by iveco:I feel that females, being the SUPERIOR species, should be the SOLE gender to serve as clergy.
i tot iveco is catholic?Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:Hmm, coming from an apostate and pagan, I'm not surprised.
Men is not superior to Woman, Woman is not superior to Man.