Fundamentalist Christianity
-
Sisters?Originally posted by laoda99:what is a mantilla?
But I swore I have see sisters wearing covering for their heads.....
Not habit meh? -
Neither do we.Originally posted by laurence82:Thats prolly one of the reasons why I aint a Christian
I dont support women as a lesser being to man
-
in what way does the covering of the head degrade a woman's status?Originally posted by laurence82:Thats prolly one of the reasons why I aint a Christian
I dont support women as a lesser being to man
giving her as little clothes as possible, and letting men give her wolf whistles grants her more dignity?
What a twisted society!
-
given ur current situation, its hard to imagine that you are MCPOriginally posted by laoda99:no wonder gals like u ....
haizz....i am just an MCP.....
kekekeke -
go google it la...Originally posted by laoda99:what is a mantilla?
But I swore I have see sisters wearing covering for their heads.....
yeah, nuns wear the veil as part of their habit. for catholic lay women, traditionally they wear the mantilla. white for singles, black for married or widows. -
hmmmOriginally posted by SingaporeMacross:in what way does the covering of the head degrade a woman's status?
giving her as little clothes as possible, and letting men give her wolf whistles grants her more dignity?
What a twisted society!
not a bad idea.....woman should have the dignity of able to show off their bodies mah....if not.....where can we find so many jpgs???
-
You have to ask God Himself lah.Originally posted by laoda99:hmmm....why?
And while you are at it, also ask for us why He didn't give our bishops to power to dissolve marriages. -
you and i are very happy about it, but it somehow it does not make it right.Originally posted by laoda99:hmmm
not a bad idea.....woman should have the dignity of able to show off their bodies mah....if not.....where can we find so many jpgs??? 
-
Hmmm....I tot he gave permission to some dissolved marriage...according to scriptures?Originally posted by ObiterDicta:You have to ask God Himself lah.
And while you are at it, also ask for us why He didn't give our bishops to power to dissolve marriages.
But this one I support u. Told my gf this and she not happy haha -
Its not what she wears, but what she is subjected to wearOriginally posted by SingaporeMacross:in what way does the covering of the head degrade a woman's status?
giving her as little clothes as possible, and letting men give her wolf whistles grants her more dignity?
What a twisted society!
And, cannot lar
Its like for the love of money that is the root of all evil
in this case, man is the cause, not woman
covering her as much as possible wont really reduce lust, given the many new fetishes of man nowadays
some even got fetishes about school uniforms, a purely innocent clotheswear
hurhur -
So if woman is subjected to wear kinky clothes, also cannot right? it would insult their right to cover from head to toe....Originally posted by laurence82:Its not what she wears, but what she is subjected to wear
And, cannot lar
Its like for the love of money that is the root of all evil
in this case, man is the cause, not woman
covering her as much as possible wont really reduce lust, given the many new fetishes of man nowadays
some even got fetishes about school uniforms, a purely innocent clotheswear
hurhur
part in red i disagree.....dress them like ninjas (u noe what i mean) and nobody will sure be interested in them.....
school uniforms innocent meh? wait till u see their "modified" versions......
in bkk i love to see gals in uniforms coz theirs really dun look like uniform -
i agree with my muslim fren...
it is better for a muslim gal to cover her head when she is in mosque, becoz her long hair will sure attract stares from males....
never see those panteine or dove shampoo ads? -
I'm not absolving men of any blame. It takes two hands to clap.Originally posted by laurence82:Its not what she wears, but what she is subjected to wear
And, cannot lar
Its like for the love of money that is the root of all evil
in this case, man is the cause, not woman
covering her as much as possible wont really reduce lust, given the many new fetishes of man nowadays
some even got fetishes about school uniforms, a purely innocent clotheswear
hurhur -
harloOriginally posted by laoda99:So if woman is subjected to wear kinky clothes, also cannot right? it would insult their right to cover from head to toe....
part in red i disagree.....dress them like ninjas (u noe what i mean) and nobody will sure be interested in them.....
school uniforms innocent meh? wait till u see their "modified" versions......
in bkk i love to see gals in uniforms coz theirs really dun look like uniform
not covering them in overabundance of clothes doesnt mean one has to go to the extreme of wearing kinky or no clothes lar
>. -
Hmmm.... i will definitely support the idea of gals who want to wear kinky clothes.....Originally posted by laurence82:harlo
not covering them in overabundance of clothes doesnt mean one has to go to the extreme of wearing kinky or no clothes lar
>.
it is free will man...... -
school uniforms are innocent items
the modification part, well, that comes from the wonderful imagination of men
haha -
....Originally posted by laoda99:Hmmm.... i will definitely support the idea of gals who want to wear kinky clothes.....
it is free will man......
i got nuthing to say liao
>.< -
hmmm...men meh?Originally posted by laurence82:school uniforms are innocent items
the modification part, well, that comes from the wonderful imagination of men
haha
my gf says she modified her jc skirt (ask her mum to do it) and her mum says:" so short can meh?"
and she said "yes" -
that, is towards the kinky clothes partOriginally posted by laoda99:hmmm...men meh?
my gf says she modified her jc skirt (ask her mum to do it) and her mum says:" so short can meh?"
and she said "yes"
i feel like drawing a tree diagram i used in my business modules
>.< -
if men arent lustful, what women wear doesnt matterOriginally posted by SingaporeMacross:I'm not absolving men of any blame. It takes two hands to clap. -
we don't know....accuracy is determined according to the similarity of words and etc.Originally posted by Icemoon:In any case, the DSS is still closer to the LXX than Masoretic.
for the part in red .. I stand corrected.
LXX and Masoretic cannot be compared. hebrew words and Greek words are soo different -
impossible.....unless all men are gayOriginally posted by laurence82:if men arent lustful, what women wear doesnt matter -
this one I have to agree with ah lau...Originally posted by laurence82:if men arent lustful, what women wear doesnt matter -
of course they can be compared. if you let Jesus Christ read the LXX and Masoretic (he should be proficient in hebrew and koine greek), he can tell you which one more accurate.Originally posted by Ironside:we don't know....accuracy is determined according to the similarity of words and etc.
LXX and Masoretic cannot be compared. hebrew words and Greek words are soo different -
That..is another form of lustOriginally posted by laoda99:impossible.....unless all men are gay
>.