In contrast, the Anglican Communion not only recognizes Roman Catholic ordinations as valid, but, in some churches, invites Roman Catholics and other baptised Christians to share in the Anglican eucharist. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Vatican views Anglicans as "separated brothers and sisters" who are ineligible to receive the Catholic eucharist
like that is end of spectrum liao? I thought this is the quintessential Protestant.Originally posted by vince69:On the other end of the spectrum, we have the Ultra-conservatives, who believe that God had stop speaking once the Bible is fully cannoised, preferring to find their answers in the Bible (the written Word of God) only.
Originally posted by Ironside:
[b]Reformed Churches
On the essntials of the faith: they agree.
On non-essential distinctives:
1) Calvinistic [five points]
2) Puritanic
3) Some are Baptistic while others are Presbyterian
4) Covenant theology
5) Cessationist [they believe that tougues and other prophetic gifts as ended when the cannon was completed]
6) Church government: to those who are Baptistic, they are Congregationalist. others are presbyterian. i have not yet heard of Reformed churches as episcopalian in thier church government.
Evangelical Churches
on essentials: the same as the Reformed
on non-essentials:
1) Some are Calvinist, some are 4, 3, 2, 1 point Calvinist. others are Arminian
2) Some are Puritanic others are not.
3) Some are Baptistic others are Presbyterian
4) Some are covenant advocates, others are dispensationalist
5) Cessationist with regards to tougues and prophetic gifts.
6) church government: some are episcopalian, others presbyterian, others congregationalist.
But they all believe in:
1) salvation by faith alone
2) bible alone
3) Trinity [included here of course is the belief in the deity of Christ]
there are so many other non-essential distinctives. But remember if they adhere to these essentials they are under one Head Christ:
Mr 9:38 Now John answered Him, saying, "Teacher, we saw someone who does not follow us casting out demons in Your name, and we forbade him because he does not follow us."
39 But Jesus said, "Do not forbid him, for no one who works a miracle in My name can soon afterward speak evil of Me.
40 "For he who is not against us is on our side.
In heaven we will have one theology
Some may go far astray from Biblical theology for awhile in the non-essentials but thank God for other brethren in other churches who have been illuminated by the Holy Spirit who came to know right theology, we are corrected. Here we are in the process of uniting our theology, our knowledge of Christ and God. There in heaven we will have unity of THE faith:
Eph 4:11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers,
12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ,
13 till we all come to the unity of [b]the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God[/b], to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ;
Notice in verse 13 it says: THE faith. This refers not to the faith that we placed on Christ for salvation. This refers to the truths about God and and His ways, Christ and His works. In short, this refers to theology.
[/b]
Originally posted by Repented John 2:What abt charismatic churches?
Originally posted by Icemoon:like that is end of spectrum liao? I thought this is the quintessential Protestant.
I can show the similaritiesOriginally posted by NT2:Let's present to the best of our abilities the distinctives and certain uniques things abt a particular denomination. U need not come from that denomination to post anything here. A proper research n study will do.
Hope that such a thread will let people understand more abt the various denominations as being diversity in unity and not being a sign of disagreements.
Dun think so. Think it is cultish.Originally posted by Honeybunz:
What is Restorationism? another name for Fundie?
Actually both are much more alike than they think, for did not Solomon say that there is nothing new under the sun in Eccelsiastes? So what ever revelation that Yahweh would have given would be something He already said in the bible for Yahweh is the same yesterday, today and forever.Originally posted by vince69:Among Christian denominations today, there are two extreme practices; On one end are the Ultra-charismatics who believed in the spoken word of God, i.e. Holy Spirit (ie. God) speaking to them giving them “fresh revelation” everyday, to this everything/anything can be a “sign” from God. On the other end of the spectrum, we have the Ultra-conservatives, who believe that God had stop speaking once the Bible is fully cannoised, preferring to find their answers in the Bible (the written Word of God) only.
No, Protestant Our Father is based on a different translation.Originally posted by fymk:All say our father the same way
the problem arise when the former would refer to the latter as a dead church and the latter refer to the former as demon processed.Originally posted by breytonhartge:Actually both are much more alike than they think, for did not Solomon say that there is nothing new under the sun in Eccelsiastes? So what ever revelation that Yahweh would have given would be something He already said in the bible for Yahweh is the same yesterday, today and forever.
And to the ultra conservatives, if the seek the answers in the bible is that then not Yahweh speaking to them a fresh everyday?
2 Timothy 3:16
All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
also
Hebrews 4:12
For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
I just LOVE anglican. Formed by a King who wanted a divorce but wasn't granted the permission to do so by the pope. What better way to get a divorce than to form yr own Church with you as the head of it?Originally posted by Ito_^:the charismatic churches in singapore refuse to admit they are charismatic. some denomination labels are given by others de.
i spent almost all my life in an anglican school, so ill start with it lor.
imo, angelican is essentially protestant but they also put importance in many stuff from catholic.
i think the description in wikipedia would be more accuate that what i said.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglican
methodists - Mr John Wesley.Originally posted by Icemoon:someone post something about methodist leh.
Unker CE?
Actually what are methodists famous for?
Originally posted by M©+square:I only know these things about the Wesley brothers:
[b]methodists - Mr John Wesley. [/b]
Now you know the 4th.Originally posted by Icemoon:I only know these things about the Wesley brothers:
1. mesmerising preaching
2. good composer
3. arminist
If i am not wrong Wesleyan Arminist is different from Arminist right?Originally posted by M©+square:Now you know the 4th.
Fusion. But considered Arminist liao.Originally posted by laoda99:If i am not wrong Wesleyan Arminist is different from Arminist right?