hmm...i think i get it now. the way it teaches is not the way of christians. i guess its everywhere in any religion...Originally posted by NT2:the articles shld be read by Christians but if you are not and read liao dun understand can ask questions here lor. its not a church bashing thread....i target at the ridiculous teaching.
mind sharing why you think its heresy instead of giving a sentence statement?Originally posted by NT2:http://www.newcreation.org.sg/pdf/healththrucommunion.pdf
Heresy. How Holy Communion being involved in health and wealth gospel.
sooner or later...tearing pages from bible and eat them can cure you too.
different church have different practices. some is anyone who had accepted Christ will be allowed, some must be baptised then can take, there are also some who says must check and confesses all sins and be right with God then can take.Originally posted by fallin:Btw, Holy Communion is really such a rare privilege for me because my church believes that only baptized people can take communion. I had my first ever communion recently and I thank God for that.
read the article and read the Bible passages pertaining to the Holy Communion. simple as that.Originally posted by vince69:mind sharing why you think its heresy instead of giving a sentence statement?
I am interested to hear your view/reason.
Pls also share what is Holy Communion to you.
Thanks and God Bless.
can be a bit more generous and give more than 1 sentence?Originally posted by NT2:the meaning and significance of Holy Communion can be found both in Bible and sound Christian websites
the pdf you mentioned is just an abstract to the book, you may want to read the rest of the book.Originally posted by NT2:read the article and read the Bible passages pertaining to the Holy Communion. simple as that.
unless you deny final authority of the Bible, if not you will know why.
y need my personal opinion so fast? i prefer this to be a discussion and discovery using the Bible and not my words.Originally posted by vince69:can be a bit more generous and give more than 1 sentence?
Thanks
cause, you cannot just accuse someone/some teaching is hersay without giving you reason for it. its just not right and also not fair.Originally posted by NT2:y need my personal opinion so fast? i prefer this to be a discussion and discovery using the Bible and not my words.
as christians who believe the bible, i trust that you will know the reason.Originally posted by vince69:cause, you cannot just accuse someone/some teaching is hersay without giving you reason for it. its just not right and also not fair.
Thanks
Why not compromise a bit.Originally posted by vince69:cause, you cannot just accuse someone/some teaching is hersay without giving you reason for it. its just not right and also not fair.
Thanks
I can't read your mind.Originally posted by NT2:as christians who believe the bible, i trust that you will know the reason.
yes, I am from NCC (thought I mentioned it many times before), but I am not 'buay song' about NT's remanrk on NCC teaching being heresay, what I don't like is people accusing others without giving any reason, and when asked, just tell others to read up and seemingly want others to do the fact finding for him.Originally posted by Icemoon:Oh .. I know the reason why vince is buay song about NT's comments liao!
'cos vince is from NCC ..
I agree with you, but as a form of courtesy I think you should read that article first (if you have not).Originally posted by vince69:yes, I am from NCC (thought I mentioned it many times before), but I am not 'buay song' about NT's remanrk on NCC teaching being heresay, what I don't like is people accusing others without giving any reason, and when asked, just tell others to read up and seemingly want others to do the fact finding for him.
Its like going to court and accuse someone is guilty without giving and proof, then tell the jury to go find the facts themselves.
Since NT2 is the one who started this, I think its only fair that he should bring out the evidence to support his own view and arguments.
Else, everyone can just say, Go read the bible yourself (without even quoting where in the Bible somemore)
Thanks
Icemoon,Originally posted by Icemoon:I agree with you, but as a form of courtesy I think you should read that article first (if you have not).
Maybe you also find it rubbish ..
ok .. I think you have done your part.Originally posted by vince69:Icemoon,
I had read the article (from the pdf link provided by NT2 in the other thread on NCC) and that's why I can say, its just an abstract from the original book.
btw, I don't find it rubbish.
God Bless.
actually I won't be so unhappy if the case was presented probably in the first post.Originally posted by Icemoon:ok .. I think you have done your part.
It is up to NT2 to present his case.
That's why it is better for interested parties to read it first.Originally posted by NT2:i refuse to present now so as not to influence ppl with my thinking. i could be wrong for all u know