Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible.
-
No lar. I was too "high" just now. It is another period of time to kill my brain cells......Originally posted by Honeybunz:u very happy wor!
-
No such thing, he never said that women had no souls.Originally posted by iveco:But Aquinas was a misogynist. He said that women had no souls and therefore needed to be repressed. As a result, many of them were burnt at the stake for daring to think differently. -
which imman or will the ayatollah admit the Quran is just another human-inspired book?
I guess they are all dishonest heh?
hi icemoon,..
r u asking abt iman or imam???
-
Go read up Cabot & Cowan. It is mentioned in one of their books.Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:No such thing, he never said that women had no souls. -
wrong spelling .. sorry .. i meant to say the muslim counterpart of pastor.Originally posted by unforge:which imman or will the ayatollah admit the Quran is just another human-inspired book?
I guess they are all dishonest heh?
hi icemoon,..
r u asking abt iman or imam??? -
Imran ?
-
St Thomas Aquinas is commonly attacked by the feminists. In any case, Aquinas thought that God infuses a soul into a baby girl on the eightieth day after conception. Now, that "eightieth day" part was his personal opinion, not official Catholic dogma.Originally posted by iveco:Go read up Cabot & Cowan. It is mentioned in one of their books.
Back then, nobody knew how human reproduction worked. Now that we know more about conception, the Church today believes that God infuses a soul into every child, male or female, at the moment of conception. Though he was wrong about the timing, Aquinas still believed - along with all his medieval contemporaries - that women have souls.
Besides, if the Church believed that women have no souls, why bother to canonise women as Saints?