wrong thread. btw there is BB in non mission govt sch.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Isn't evangelism the main mission of a mission school?There is always a choice and I'm getting sick and tired of listening to people making certain choices and not having the balls to walk away and instead trying to reform something that seems to offend them.
I'm not saying that aggressive evangelism is right, but at what point does giving information about religion to people become a crime?Let's not take the literals too literally and end up being worser off.
but a doctor job is to treat a patient. he shd leave the praying to the priest.Originally posted by dumbdumb!:why cannot use contraceptions like condoms. can wat
hmm... i can't say the doctor's intention was all bad.
as a believer, he believes in the power of god, and believes for the healing. and if it works, why not try it, there's no harm in it.
medicine cannot help everything, and cannot cure everything anyway. esp cancer.
and after praying, and the patient gets healed without the aid of medicine, did he give thanks for it? or was he being an ungrateful son of a ***** and start shooting letters complaining against the doctor?
sometimes non believers are pains in the butt too.
again, you are confusing a christian for a catholic.Originally posted by crazy monkey:but a doctor job is to treat a patient. he shd leave the praying to the priest.
so next time if your doctor is buddhist he tell you no hope liao. take out sutra and chant for you. you will be very grateful ?Originally posted by dumbdumb!:again, you are confusing a christian for a catholic.
according to the bible, all believers in the risen jesus, are considered priests and can go to God through jesus.
But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.
if the doctor feels that by praying, a miracle could happen, and its also for the patient's benefit, why should he be condemned? a doctor's job is to treat the patient, another words, make him better, it doesn't state there's a specific way to make him better right?
as long as the patient gets well.
so why should the doctor be condemned if the patient gets well? isn't it returning evil for good?
unfortunately i'm not as blind as a certain particular patient .. to judge and condemn the good intentions of the personOriginally posted by crazy monkey:so next time if your doctor is buddhist he tell you no hope liao. take out sutra and chant for you. you will be very grateful ?
you dun believe the buddhist prayer would be of any effect. many ppl believe the same for christian prayer also.Originally posted by dumbdumb!:unfortunately i'm not as blind as a certain particular patient .. to judge and condemn the good intentions of the person
i do not believe the buddhist's prayer would be of any effect. but i'll be glad to meet such a caring person who takes the time and effort to care for others.
unfortunately, no buddhist ever offered it b4 hahaha.
my dad do go to the hosptal to pray for the sick, esp if he's visiting someone. sometimes silently while walking by, or he asks their permission first.
if you're any more caring than my dad, u're welcome to flame and throw your snide remarks at him. =)
but whether they believe it works isn't the issue here is it.Originally posted by crazy monkey:you dun believe the buddhist prayer would be of any effect. many ppl believe the same for christian prayer also.
Well said.Originally posted by dumbdumb!:"if a christian is a thorn in the arse, a non christian is like this big branch being shoved up the arsehole"
when christian make that kind of statement then cannot blame ppl dun like them.Originally posted by iveco:Well said.
How else could we put it?
was the dignity of the non believer violated? was he molested in some way?Originally posted by crazy monkey:but have to respect the non-believer also wat. there are many ppl who survive without prayers and there are ppl who died despite the prayers.
i don't really see the point of bottling up what i felt was unfair.Originally posted by crazy monkey:when christian make that kind of statement then cannot blame ppl dun like them.
is there any hate in the letter ?Originally posted by dumbdumb!:i don't really see the point of bottling up what i felt was unfair.
so i guess writing a hate letter to complain against the good intentions of the doctor makes you non-believers so cuddly and lovable eh?
and it would be logical if u hate me for my comments, but hating the good doctor who didn't "make that kind of statement"? you folks are hard to please.
a very very VERY strong tinge of displeasure which is enough to actually drive someone to bother taking time out of his very busy schedule to write a letter expressing his "distraught" feelingsOriginally posted by iveco:No hate, but a strong tinge of displeasure.
but why issit immoral ? married couples may not want to have too many children because they cannot afford to wat.Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:dumbdumb!:
Birth control is gravely immoral, it has never been allowed in Christianity.
Well, at least until 1930. The Church of England's Lambeth Conference, announced that contraception would be allowed in some circumstances. Soon the Church of England completely caved in, allowing contraception across the board. Since then, all other Protestant denominations have followed suit. Does this make birth control all right? I don't think so.
Regarding the priesthood, we Catholics make a distinction between the common priesthood and the ministerial priesthood. All Christians make up the common priesthood of believers, and the ordained priests make up the ministerial priesthood.
Because only God alone decides who lives and who dies.Originally posted by crazy monkey:but why issit immoral ? married couples may not want to have too many children because they cannot afford to wat.
And what is the fundamental reason for saying No?Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:No!!
but the baby not conceived yet. besides without birth control humans would probably overun the earth.Originally posted by iveco:Because only God alone decides who lives and who dies.
... and also there should be no doctors and hospitals because by trying to save lives is intervening with God's will.Originally posted by iveco:Because only God alone decides who lives and who dies.
this is the atheist argument, ironically. By feeding the patient with medication, you are lowering his resistance to future diseases. Since your genes get passed down, your descendants will have less resistance too. Yah. So don't save.Originally posted by crazy monkey:... and also there should be no doctors and hospitals because by trying to save lives is intervening with God's will.
I don't understand his good intentions. I mean .. by all means pray for the patient, like your dad, BUT WHY ASK THE PATIENT TO PRAY WITH HIM TOO?Originally posted by dumbdumb!:hmm... i can't say the doctor's intention was all bad.
as a believer, he believes in the power of god, and believes for the healing. and if it works, why not try it, there's no harm in it.