Simple mathematics to solve.
-
This is because I have assigned 1 and 2 and so on to a some given values in the beginning. Don't you see it. Please. It is illogical..... You know Maths?Originally posted by laurence82:i think gasband already shown how equations like 1 + 1 need not be 2...
-
Sigh, somebody still cant see it
The wonders of maths.... -
Numbers by itself have no additional value. 1 = 1 , 2 = 2 and so on.Originally posted by laurence82:Sigh, somebody still cant see it
The wonders of maths....
When I say 1 + 1 =2, I mean the absolute value, the real value of 1 lar.
Anything can be easily twisted. Not careful, will be deceived. -
still, u just admit, it still can be twisted....
its very contradictory, u said 1 + 1 = 2 is because we dont put values to it, but yet we did
the 1 we understand today is because we put our own understanding of 1 to it
for example, one apple, one pound, one lifetime, even 1 itself can be construed in many ways
thats why the creation of 0 for nothing was considered a breakthrough in maths, nobody b4 that know how to do it, even tho we consider it basic maths nowadays
same goes for binary system, hexadecimal system, Arabic and Roman numerals and greeks maths on -1
by the way, +1 to be exact, is also derived from Greeks needing to absolute the number -1.... -
erm.. i shall stick to my derivatives thk u very much .....Originally posted by laurence82:still, u just admit, it still can be twisted....
its very contradictory, u said 1 + 1 = 2 is because we dont put values to it, but yet we did
the 1 we understand today is because we put our own understanding of 1 to it
for example, one apple, one pound, one lifetime, even 1 itself can be construed in many ways
thats why the creation of 0 for nothing was considered a breakthrough in maths, nobody b4 that know how to do it, even tho we consider it basic maths nowadays
same goes for binary system, hexadecimal system, Arabic and Roman numerals and greeks maths on -1
by the way, +1 to be exact, is also derived from Greeks needing to absolute the number -1....
but seriously.. when was the concept of 0 brought forth? -
derivatives? paiseh, for moment i was thinking of my futures, options and warrantsOriginally posted by ben1xy:erm.. i shall stick to my derivatives thk u very much .....
but seriously.. when was the concept of 0 brought forth?
i am not sure, but one need not look far
Indians are the one who gave the world 0, and the Arabic numerals we all are using today, meaning 1 2 3 4 5 instead of I II III IV V -
hmm cool stuffOriginally posted by laurence82:derivatives? paiseh, for moment i was thinking of my futures, options and warrants
i am not sure, but one need not look far
Indians are the one who gave the world 0, and the Arabic numerals we all are using today, meaning 1 2 3 4 5 instead of I II III IV V -
JNWK ----> Yes I am a christian
Laurence82 ------> Yes i am such a genius muahahaha....
Ben -----> yeah I am the mod of Jesus Freak forum which is pretty much dead now but I am glad that we have EH anyway....
I HATE MATHS....But I LOVE CRAP!!! -
This is two totally different cases. I'm refering to the original intended meaning of 1 when the number system is created at that point.Originally posted by laurence82:still, u just admit, it still can be twisted....
its very contradictory, u said 1 + 1 = 2 is because we dont put values to it, but yet we did
the 1 we understand today is because we put our own understanding of 1 to it
for example, one apple, one pound, one lifetime, even 1 itself can be construed in many ways
thats why the creation of 0 for nothing was considered a breakthrough in maths, nobody b4 that know how to do it, even tho we consider it basic maths nowadays
same goes for binary system, hexadecimal system, Arabic and Roman numerals and greeks maths on -1
by the way, +1 to be exact, is also derived from Greeks needing to absolute the number -1....
If you are refering to the twisted version, well, 1 + 1 can be of any values you like depending what you assign to the value.
BUT I'm not refering to the twisted version. I'm refering to the genuine of 1 + 1 when it is first created. I still don't understand why you must pursuade me to accept the twisted version of 1 + 1. The original intended value of 1 + 1 is 2. But now it has been twisted le.
I still must emphaise that I'm refering to the orginal intended version of 1 + 1. Please do not keep distorting my intended meaning leh, though it is good that you have provide me with information that 1 + 1 can be twisted to other values.
TY -
Twisted? I think the right word is to 'comprehend'
My first line was on twisted, but unfortunately, not the rest of my post. U got to read carefully my posts.
Besides understanding the absolute 1 as we do in basic maths, i did say the way we understand 1 is like we understand 1 apple, 1 cherry, 1 pound...
We already assign the value based on our judgement, and i knew we started this argument because u talk abt truth which is narrow in views and that i talk abt perspectives. Thats why i used the example of Indian creation of the numebr 0 to represent nothing, null, doit...
Before the indians do that, isnt it amazing no humans thought of that? Because we are so used to it as basic maths, we forgot our ancestors took quite an effort to come up with it. Same for other numerical systems, whether Arabic or Roman numerals
Thats my point why 1 is derived from giving it values and our judgement. Thats why i already said from begining 1 + 1 is too simple to use as an analogy.
Similarly, absolute 1 or real values is used because some peeps discover -1. Thats why another derivative of 1 is from absoluting, if i may use such term, -1. -
Due to the "sensitivity" and stupidity of the answer, I will not post the answer le, ok?
-
Originally posted by jnwk:Due to the "sensitivity" and stupidity of the answer, I will not post the answer le, ok?
u better post hor .... everyone gave their answer le... -
No lar. Not everyone has given. I think you also haven't give the answer.Originally posted by ben1xy:
u better post hor .... everyone gave their answer le...
Wait I post the answer, people throw bad remarks at me how? -
well, the world like that, its always the rest are stupid, u are right
with an attitude like that, u want to spread the gospels? -
by the way, because the way this forum is run, i dare say this is a good place for flaming,.....
-
my answer is 3125 laOriginally posted by jnwk:No lar. Not everyone has given. I think you also haven't give the answer.
Wait I post the answer, people throw bad remarks at me how? -
Ha ha.... It was meant to be a test and a passing remark. I was just trying to be funny..... Attitude cannot be judged by what is written in the forum.
In the first place, the problem given is only just for the fun of it. Just a fun problem......
Ha ha.... well, if you like it, I will post my answer soon. -
Attitude can be seen easily by what is written on the forum.
-
Next time, I will pose myself as an irritating person using a different nick.
-
try not to let smaplionheart catch ya
he is on the prowl.... -
Originally posted by laurence82:try not to let smaplionheart catch ya
he is on the prowl.... -
I owe all of you an answer. So my answer is 5=1.Originally posted by jnwk:Can anyone give me the correct answer to the simple problem below. Take a break, solve a maths problem.
1 = 5
2 = 25
3 = 125
4 = 625
5 = ?
For the fun of it.
Why?
In the first place 1 cannot be 5 and so on, mathematically. But since I have set those rules in the beginning, this is a special case. In the beginning, I set 1 to be equal to 5 and so 5 will be equal to 1 lo. How can 5 be equal to some other value neh?
so,
1= 5
2 = 25 = 21
3 = 125 = 12 = 121 and so on
4 = 625 = 62 = 621 and so on
5 = 1
If you are playing with sequence, it should be:
5, 25, 125, 625, ? ---> ? = 3125 lo
Wa lao, in the beginning, I have set this rules le, yet you guys never listen. [kidding]
~ That's my answers. ~
No prize for those who answers correctly.
-
pukes bloodOriginally posted by happyharvest:I owe all of you an answer. So my answer is 5=1.
Why?
In the first place 1 cannot be 5 and so on, mathematically. But since I have set those rules in the beginning, this is a special case. In the beginning, I set 1 to be equal to 5 and so 5 will be equal to 1 lo. How can 5 be equal to some other value neh?
so,
1= 5
2 = 25 = 21
3 = 125 = 12 = 121 and so on
4 = 625 = 62 = 621 and so on
5 = 1
If you are playing with sequence, it should be:
5, 25, 125, 625, ? ---> ? = 3125 lo
Wa lao, in the beginning, I have set this rules le, yet you guys never listen. [kidding]
~ That's my answers. ~
No prize for those who answers correctly. 
-
I'm waiting for people to make me pukes blood heh heh.Originally posted by ben1xy:pukes blood
Wait for me, then we puke together.