hmmm...my opinion is...what is liberal to u...may not be liberal to others...Originally posted by Lingos:First of all.. the Christian church is not known to be liberal.
You might want to check the dictionary on the definition of liberal.
So... u wanna go back to the fundamentals.. ie. No electricity, no driving, no nothing???Originally posted by laoda99:hmmm...my opinion is...what is liberal to u...may not be liberal to others...
hmmm....think u r not aware of the sectarian rifts in other faiths also....Originally posted by iveco:Believe me, Buddhists are more liberal. They aren't known to go to war over differences. What goes on in Thailand and Sri Lanka is more of a national security issue. Christians and muslims, however, have undertaken "holy" wars.
Well, as Earthlings pointed out, the Dalai Lama welcomes gays with open arms. The pope treats them as the spawn of the Devil.Originally posted by laoda99:hmmm....think u r not aware of the sectarian rifts in other faiths also....
Originally posted by iveco:sweeping?
Well, as Earthlings pointed out, the Dalai Lama welcomes gays with open arms. The pope treats them as the [b]spawn of the Devil.[/b]
Spawns of the devil? No such thing!Originally posted by laoda99:sweeping?
I doubt he'd do that. He is against capital punishment.Originally posted by laoda99:Are christians too nice and compromising that they are bashed? what if one day the pope decides to issue a fatwa too on Dan Brown?
which is why i believe: it is not that the church got something to hide...but it just choose not to attack dan brown physically, as it will compromise christ's message of love...Originally posted by iveco:I doubt he'd do that. He is against capital punishment.
i believe thats slandering islam. EXTREMISTS have no reservations killing under the pretext of religion. true muslims are just as horrified with the murder of innocents as we are. christianity has had its fair share of extremists and extremism as well, one of the more recent examples being the catholic and protestant terrorists who fought each other in North Ireland. so this slander is much uncalled for.Originally posted by laoda99:which is why i believe: it is not that the church got something to hide...but it just choose not to attack dan brown physically, as it will compromise christ's message of love...
a islamic fundamentalist will have no reservations fighting for his religion....even to the extend of killing someone condemned by a fatwa....
it is a matter of approach.Originally posted by elindra:Liberal? I believe the word you're looking for is fanatical. I'm ok with moderate Christians. They are nice people. The Christians that stain the name of Christianity are the ones who go aroudn declaring that the world goes to hell if they do not embrace Christ and they go around spreading atrocities of their own.
It's kinda like saying,"Hey accept Christ and you can live the life you want, be it rape or murder and you will still be saved. Doesn't matter what good you do now because as long as you don't accept Christ as your lord and savior, you're doomed in hell."
slandering islam? look at the recent deeds done by the extreme fundamentalist groups...i dun think i need to elaborate more.....Originally posted by HENG@:i believe thats slandering islam. EXTREMISTS have no reservations killing under the pretext of religion. true muslims are just as horrified with the murder of innocents as we are. christianity has had its fair share of extremists and extremism as well, one of the more recent examples being the catholic and protestant terrorists who fought each other in North Ireland. so this slander is much uncalled for.
fundamental as in doctrine lar...u still think we live in the stone age?Originally posted by Lingos:So... u wanna go back to the fundamentals.. ie. No electricity, no driving, no nothing???
ok.....here u rOriginally posted by ditzy:To me its more like yaya papaya. Always talking about not going to hell lah, all that stuff. Gimme a break pls.