Originally posted by breytonhartge:
Genesis 11
[b]The story is much more than God indiscriminately
interrupting an insignificant building project. The Tower of Babel
marks the origins of the nations of the Earth. Will its mistakes be
repeated by future generations?[/b]
Reply to SIS's post.Originally posted by M©+square:
So the context here is already different from your stipulated example. EVERYONE was corrupt and mankind was wicked.as said before, God find almost EVERYONE corrupted. He find almost everyone in noah world corrupted, he find sodom corrupted, midianites corrupted, egytians corrupted and he probably find animals, who never eat any fruit of wisdom corrupted. And wat do u do when u find a person is corrupted, do u try to change their ways or u kill them ? Well, god kill them ! Do he change the world filled with violence by more violence such as killing them ? He kill them as though he is restarting the computer ! Is tat love ? Do u kill your love one if he do not behave as much as u like him to ? As said in my previous statement, they seems to be living well together inthe world.
21And the LORD smelled a soothing aroma. Then the LORD said in His heart, "I will never again curse the ground for man's sake, although the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have done.Well, tat is obviously a lie since according to revelation, the world is gonna come to an end in a dramatic way. He do not intend to stop the judgement day is a sign he is gonna destroy living things as like noah ark.
God said He would never destroy the world like He did before, therefore in order to satisfy the fact that God is HOLY and cannot stand sin, He sent His only son to die for us while we were yet sinners. So that we could be reconciled to Him. So this is God's showing us He loved us. But still He loves you enough not to force you, you have to make the choice, the way is there and the requirements are clear, so if you do not want to do them, they you reap the consequences. God loves the buddhists as people. They have a choice. Following from my points, God sets the rules, you choose if you want to play by them.Why not send his son earlier instead of killing everyone ? Is tat a sign of loving ? These people without laws and without christ and without any love from god surely goes to hell isn't it ? Is tat love to these people ? He cannot stand sin so he sent his son and we can sin (OT laws) all we want after ? tat is again incredulous. If he cannot stand sins he cannot stand men since all men r sinners. How to love something and can't stand it at the same time ? About buddhist, no matter wat u say, sending them to hell is a sign he does not love buddhist. He knwo it is a lousy placy where he keep his most hatred enemies, yet he send them there to be tortured eternally. God set the rules, the rules say non-believers and buddhist rot in hell and it tat shows god does not love all, only his believers. Well, talking about reaping consequence, do u blame yourself to be a christian ? Lets say the real god is, well, muslim god and he will send his wrath to christian who do not listen to his last prophet. So u think u should reap the consequences of hell eternal just because u r a christian now ? Should u be blamed for being christian ?
For tower of babel, for goodness sake can u use your own points ? If u wanna use the author point, can... but u should do some summarising to make it become something yours first. Frankly I just see a bundle of words there and i sian liao. And I don't wanna comment it then u suddenly say it is someone else work and not your business adn I wasted my time commentingif you don't want to read it, then it is up to you, don't ask for an answer and then say sian liao... its a cop out.
For tower of babel, for goodness sake can u use your own points ? If u wanna use the author point, can... but u should do some summarising to make it become something yours first. Frankly I just see a bundle of words there and i sian liao. And I don't wanna comment it then u suddenly say it is someone else work and not your business adn I wasted my time commentingif you don't want to read it, then it is up to you, don't ask for an answer and then say sian liao... its a cop out. I WASTED MY TIME ANSWERING.
True .. I cannot but agree with SIS on this.Originally posted by stupidissmart:For tower of babel, for goodness sake can u use your own points ? If u wanna use the author point, can... but u should do some summarising to make it become something yours first. Frankly I just see a bundle of words there and i sian liao. And I don't wanna comment it then u suddenly say it is someone else work and not your business adn I wasted my time commenting
you wasted your time copying and pasting lah.Originally posted by breytonhartge:I WASTED MY TIME ANSWERING.
Originally posted by breytonhartge:if you don't want to read it, then it is up to you, don't ask for an answer and then say sian liao... its a cop out. I WASTED MY TIME ANSWERING.
Originally posted by stupidissmart:I understand why God had to do what He did. Like I said in my post, it is His perorgative. Not ours. If you were the king, you could decide right? God is KING.. He decides.
Why not send his son earlier instead of killing everyone ? Is tat a sign of loving ? These people without laws and without christ and without any love from god surely goes to hell isn't it ? Is tat love to these people ? He cannot stand sin so he sent his son and we can sin (OT laws) all we want after ? tat is again incredulous. If he cannot stand sins he cannot stand men since all men r sinners. How to love something and can't stand it at the same time ? About buddhist, no matter wat u say, sending them to hell is a sign he does not love buddhist. He knwo it is a lousy placy where he keep his most hatred enemies, yet he send them there to be tortured eternally. God set the rules, the rules say non-believers and buddhist rot in hell and it tat shows god does not love all, only his believers. Well, talking about reaping consequence, do u blame yourself to be a christian ? Lets say the real god is, well, muslim god and he will send his wrath to christian who do not listen to his last prophet. So u think u should reap the consequences of hell eternal just because u r a christian now ? Should u be blamed for being christian ?
[/b]
and you think I did not have to research an answer that was appropriate? that takes time. if you want answers, then don't say sian... the only way that answer would be appropriate would be in its entirety..Originally posted by Icemoon:you wasted your time copying and pasting lah.
I understand why God had to do what He did. Like I said in my post, it is His perorgative. Not ours. If you were the king, you could decide right? God is KING.. He decides.Tis is not a really good argument to say tat god is loving. So u tend to agree tat god treats himself as king and we as slaves and he can treat us as bad and unfair as he like
Dare you challenge God? Can you create the earth and all that is in it? Can you create the whales, the trees, the turning of the seasons? If you can, then you would know... and have your answers.The point is, I believe there is no god. And I am trying to sell tis idea tat there is no god. Even if there is god, he probably just make himself sound better but putting credit all to himself and not wat as he described himself to be and we shouldn't fear him.
You miss the point about the flood, the people were all wicked in GOD's sight and He is a righteous and HOLY God, who cannot stand sin. Even in your so called other religions, the only way to get to heaven or have salvation, is to be without sin. The other religions tell you what you should try to do to gain salvation, but God is the only one who gives you that salvation by sacrificing Jesus, His son, so that you will be without sin, this then guarantees your salvation and entry into Heaven. Now because God knows that we will never be sinless, He himself provided the perfect sacrifice for us so that we could be saved. Now how can you not call that love?How do u know if a person is righteous ? By performing righteous deeds, NOT claiming he is simply righteous. Almost everyone is wicked in his sight. A lot of his decision is almost unfair and cannot be righteous. And about u saying god gives his son (or give himself since they r the same...) for himself and then enables everyone to sin happily seems to contradict the idea he hates sins. Isn't tis incredibly silly ? he hates sin, he kill himself to offer to himself then everyone can sin since all the sin is carried by him. Meaning he have numerically more sins than anyone else which he should really detest and then he love all of the sinners who he should really hate. It doesn't even sound logical. If sin is tranferable then it is probably the most unfair and silliest system in the world. If he knew we were never sinless, then why ask us to become one ? I mean if u made a doll tat can't sing, do u blame the doll for not singing or blame yourself ?
It is hard enough to sacrifice your self for someone you love, how much more difficult to sacrifice your one and only son whom you love for people you do not know so that He can accomplish that which He desired, the salvation of all mankind. Now you only have to choose, God has made sure that all can be saved.U need to understand the idea of sacrifice. If he sent his son to fight the devil and he die, then it is sacrifice. If he is powerless to save the world and have to kill his son, then it is sacrifice. But in here he sacrifice his son( or himself from trinity) TO HIMSELF, or to appease himself so he can forgive people ?!?!? Isn't tat logically wrong ? I kill myself so I can forgive my enemies ? I burn 1 million off so u don't have to return your 10 cents to me ? Why not just forget about the 10 cents and keep the 1 million dollars ? Why not just forgive your enemy without killing yourself ? Why not forgive men without killing christ (or strangely himself, something like committing suicide isn't it ?)
God is a righteous God, He has certain requirements that have to be met, and instead of asking you to meet them, which we can never, He met them Himself for us so that we can spend eternity with Him.So u say in the end he finally realise he is wrong and REGRET, and structually change his standard ? Is tat all mighty, all knowing or perfect ?
and you think I did not have to research an answer that was appropriate? that takes time. if you want answers, then don't say sian... the only way that answer would be appropriate would be in its entirety..then do u think I do not waste time in the replies for u ? Okie, I don't use the word "sian". But u should really repharased the attached okie ? Otherwise it seems to be an excuse tat u yourself do not really understand the passage yourself and can't give a summary of it...
This is the Tower of Babel story from as told by the Jewish people... passed down through generations by word of mouth.So actually no one really knew who is nimrod for sure other than he a hunter and son of cush. According to history, there is really no record of him. If u wanna trust old wives tale, then probably there r countless examples such as Pang Gu or Nu Wa from chinese mythology or tooth fairies
Nimrod declares himself a god and he becomes a tyrant King. He uses religion as a political instrument to impose his domination and will upon the masses. In his role as a god, Nimrod defines good and evil to suit his needs.Well, in the end men still lived with kings. Nothing different between before and after. Nobody formed a republic, but rather war between men started. Isn't tat making it worse ? So wat is the point ?
This type of exploitation will be repeated many times throughout history.
As a system, this is unfortunately self-perpetuating. For example, many Pharaohs were deified. We know that some of the Pharaohs practiced Monotheism in their private life and they rejected paganism. Yet, they were compelled to act in public as a god so as not to disrupt the local religious establishment and industries.
Nimrod leads Mankind in rebellion against G-d.But the bible states
Nimrod denies that G-d is involved with the affairs of the world. He disassociates the flood as an act of G-d's will and as a consequence of MankindÂ’s behavior. He supports a theory which proposes that the Great Flood was a natural and predictable event. You see, the flood occurred 1656 years after Creation. Obviously, the Earth experiences sky quakes that occur in cycles of 1656 years and they cause floods. Nimrod commissions the construction of a huge tower to hold back the sky to protect civilization from the next eruption.
He also intends to install an idol at the top of this tower.
G-d intervenes and suddenly instills seventy languages within the world population. The civilized world can no longer freely communicate. The language barriers cause strife and frustration. The construction of the tower comes to a halt. Mankind disperses and develops into seventy nations.
haizzz....again SIS......it really goes down to faithOriginally posted by stupidissmart:the question can be ask back. Why do u think god love is for all ? U don't know him, u don't understand him, his future actions stated otherwise (non-believers go to hell) and his past actions do not speak well for him (noah). Why do u have the faith he is love for all ?
u can say i always look on the positive things, i agree....but think abt it.....u always look on the negative side of things and leave out all the positive ones.I never mention tat god zapped those who don't believe in him I am saying if god exists, then his plans is to send all people of other religion to hell, then he really is an unfair god. BTW, if people r zapped, then it shows god exists. The fact is, no one is zapped no matter wat they say, actually means there is no god
U keep insisting GOD zapped those who dun believe in him, but look at u...are u zapped? if he really is evil like what u said and wanna zap u, do u think he need to wait?
i really dun wish to go into theology which will really make everyone confused....it really is a simple faith....if u believe.....u can't really seperate theology from a religion It is like seperating words from literature. U say just believe, but believe in wat ? Tell me wat specifically do u believe. Theology isn't it ? Jesus story is also theology. God acts also theology. Wat do u believe in ? Your own religion ?
Originally posted by stupidissmart:i really think the part in bold is in question....
He killed all of the people, including the animals just because he felt they r too "evil". Do u kill your little brother when u felt he is evil, especially if the rest of the community seems to be surviving well all along with him ? How about towel of babel. [b]Men only construct a tower and they can achieve greater good, but god, somehow becomes jealous or kiasu, curse all men and make them bicker and conflict with one another. Perhaps why men have so much conflicts now is all a lousy curse for making a tower which he never prohibits before. Is tat love ? Is purposely segregating people and making them unable to understand each other love ? [/b]
Now u say he never exist...just now u said he killed so many pple......Originally posted by stupidissmart:I never mention tat god zapped those who don't believe in him I am saying if god exists, then his plans is to send all people of other religion to hell, then he really is an unfair god. BTW, if people r zapped, then it shows god exists. The fact is, no one is zapped no matter wat they say, actually means there is no god
really think the part in bold is in question....please explain
i really dunno what greater good u are talking about....be united, making a name for themselves. They r from the bible u know
Now u say he never exist...just now u said he killed so many pple......U get it wrongly. It is arguing from a christian perspective, meaning even if u r a christian and u believe the bible is true, it also implies tat u had believed in a cruel god. It is nothing about my beliefs on the killing part. For the god zapping people, u say tat I was not zapped even though I try to ask people not to believe in the bible. My point to u is being zapped is a sign tat god exists. Nobody is zapped is really a sign tat god does not
i somehow think a part of u still believe in a sovereign god...even though it is 99.99 percent sci/logic and 0.01 god....
My questions:Originally posted by stupidissmart:U get it wrongly. It is arguing from a christian perspective, meaning even if u r a christian and u believe the bible is true, it also implies tat u had believed in a cruel god. It is nothing about my beliefs on the killing part. For the god zapping people, u say tat I was not zapped even though I try to ask people not to believe in the bible. My point to u is being zapped is a sign tat god exists. Nobody is zapped is really a sign tat god does not
Why do u think the building of the tower of babbel is for a great good?Obviously the bible states tat it is to unite men together. If men were united, then we wouldn't see so much conflicts among men. Tat is the purpose of the bible
what kind of good? what is the purpose do u think it is for?
i dunno when u wrote just now u were talking only from the christianMy idea of zapping is like suddenly dissappear in a puff of smoke. According to bible, god killed many men. But according to history or wat we see now, men don't suddenly go "zapped". So god is cruel and killed many people is true, and god never appear in modern day where it can be properly recorded to zap people is true (which is a sign that shows tat there is really no god). R u clear with the explanation ?
perspective. The destruction u kept mentioning only let me think u believe
GOD zapped everyone. Now u decided GOD never did zapped anyone.
Mebbe u are unsure also? Did he really zapped everyone or give pple a
chance?
If u really argue from a christian's perspective...GOD can never be cruel....he is a loving GOD. Do u think u believed u are arguing from a christian's perspective and in fact u arent?Okie, argue from the bible perspective and it can show god is cruel.
is that really what the bible says (that it is to unite men together?)Originally posted by stupidissmart:Obviously the bible states tat it is to unite men together. If men were united, then we wouldn't see so much conflicts among men. Tat is the purpose of the bible
My idea of zapping is like suddenly dissappear in a puff of smoke. According to bible, god killed many men. But according to history or wat we see now, men don't suddenly go "zapped". So god is cruel and killed many people is true, and god never appear in modern day where it can be properly recorded to zap people is true (which is a sign that shows tat there is really no god). R u clear with the explanation ?
Okie, argue from the bible perspective and it can show god is cruel
warrao....why always say we fight lehOriginally posted by Icemoon:wah leow .. SIS so busy (he claims to return arnd Sep) can parry the two of them meh?