For me, it means men have to make an effort to know GODOriginally posted by SingaporeMacross:Well, we try our best to build His kingdom here on Earth, and in a way, WE are the kingdom of God.
But they might not know Him. So we need to bring Him to them.Originally posted by laoda99:For me, it means men have to make an effort to know GOD
Which is why the kingdom of GOD is within u...
I agreed. Do u think u can bring stupidsmart to him? I dun think it is an easy taskOriginally posted by SingaporeMacross:But they might not know Him. So we need to bring Him to them.
It simply means we are part of God. We can enter his kingdom because we are part of him.Originally posted by laoda99:The kingdom of God is within you" (Lk. 17:21).
To what extent do u agree with this verse? What strikes u when u read this verse and what is the idea u grasp from it? Care to share?
It's terribly hard, but we'll all pray for him I guess.Originally posted by laoda99:I agreed. Do u think u can bring stupidsmart to him? I dun think it is an easy task
no I guess here.. if we all want to pray for him, lets all agree together so that SIS will have the scales dropped from his eyes to see the light...Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:It's terribly hard, but we'll all pray for him I guess.
I think we already have more than 3 pple praying for him alreadyOriginally posted by breytonhartge:no I guess here.. if we all want to pray for him, lets all agree together so that SIS will have the scales dropped from his eyes to see the light...
shall we christian brothers agree on this? It says in the bible where 2 or 3 agree it shall be done...
Shall we be in agreement on this?
very wellOriginally posted by breytonhartge:no I guess here.. if we all want to pray for him, lets all agree together so that SIS will have the scales dropped from his eyes to see the light...
shall we christian brothers agree on this? It says in the bible where 2 or 3 agree it shall be done...
Shall we be in agreement on this?
lol youre kinda right....we should draw the line some somewhere.Originally posted by laurence82:the way u guys go on, u are like making fun of non believers, even for the serious atheists...
sorry....let's stop here abt SIS shall we...Originally posted by laurence82:the way u guys go on, u are like making fun of non believers, even for the serious atheists...
no l82, we are serious.. well at least I am.. and I know laoda is... we have a genuine concern for where you all end up... and we would like that to be in heaven... call me what you will, but I still want to see you in heaven...so I will pray.Originally posted by laurence82:the way u guys go on, u are like making fun of non believers, even for the serious atheists...
not over zealousness, but passionate...Originally posted by M©+square:I don't know why. But i feel disgusted.......
Over zealousness? I don't know.
I don't see that. Anyway...i'll stop here.Originally posted by breytonhartge:not over zealousness, but passionate...
point duly noted... sorry SIS.Originally posted by laurence82:lagggg
Anyway, i know what SIS posted challenged the doctrines or scriptures of a faith, which is disturbing coz i dont see the need to do that. But many has agreed debates with him has been intellectual.
I dont see him personally mark or flame anyone here, or even do name callings or make fun of them.
Do yourselves a favour, and give him and yourselves a bit of respect.
Intellectual meh?Originally posted by laurence82:Anyway, i know what SIS posted challenged the doctrines or scriptures of a faith, which is disturbing coz i dont see the need to do that. But many has agreed debates with him has been intellectual.
Not sure abt the circa, but why he want to discuss these issues from a theological point of view if he doesnt believe in them?Originally posted by Icemoon:Intellectual meh?
The part where I argued with him about the life and death of some famous personalities, he still refused to see my point that historians are not totally sure on some of the dates, that's why they put a "circa" there.
Worse, I showed him evidence that some sources put "circa", he tried to show me some sources didn't, then he concluded that historians are sure of those dates. Wah leow ..
And all of these were not even theological discussions, just secular issues.